How disgusting, Senator Boxer, ma’am.
Always about skin color for these people. MT @BarbaraBoxer: Latest example of the GOP's outreach to minorities – oppose the Perez nomination
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) March 19, 2013
Truth. And especially when it comes to the always foul Senator Boxer, who has expressed utter befuddlement at the mere thought that minorities don’t all think the same. It is her vile updated “all you people look alike.”
Barbara Boxer was shocked into disbelief at the very idea that Harry Alford, the chair of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, actually dared to disagree with the NAACP and the 100 Black Men of Atlanta. Oh, no. That did not suit. Race politics is the Left’s bread and butter. How dare anyone try to break out of the box that Democrats have made for them!
There can’t possibly be reasons to oppose Perez! Except, of course, there are.
My column today: Who is Thomas Perez? Obama’s Likely Nominee for Secretary of (Illegal Alien) Labor==> http://t.co/29sbUg8dfn
— Michelle Malkin (@michellemalkin) March 13, 2013
Non-racist Twitter users, who see people for the content of their character and not the color of their skin, give the senator the business.
I mean, nobody thinks the GOP is opposing Perez because he's Hispanic. Nobody. That doesn't stop idiots like @BarbaraBoxer from saying it.
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) March 19, 2013
Recommended
What it signals is that @BarbaraBoxer isn't interested in the GOP's actual objections to Perez. Probably bc she doesn't understand them.
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) March 19, 2013
@BarbaraBoxer is the race card the only one you've ever been dealt? You're such an unserious person.
— Jeremy Avery (@therealjavery) March 19, 2013
You're a hack and a fool. RT @BarbaraBoxer: Here’s the latest example of the GOP's outreach to minorities – oppose the Perez nomination
— Phineas Fahrquar (@irishspy) March 19, 2013
https://twitter.com/ticogringopaisa/status/314080322700595200
https://twitter.com/mckalarose/status/314081812215390208
@gabrielmalor @scott_tanner1 @barbaraboxer 46 of 48 no votes for Clarence Thomas were democrats. Flat out racism
— Andrews Dad (@Andrew_Dad) March 19, 2013
@BarbaraBoxer What a racist you are to assume there's no possible other reason to oppose the Perez nomination.
— Kate (@kateinva) March 19, 2013
Barbara Boxer's right. The GOP should ignore his policies and support Perez on the grounds of his ethnicity. That wouldn't be racist at all.
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) March 19, 2013
And exit questions for Sen. Boxer:
RT @scott_tanner1: @gabrielmalor @BarbaraBoxer Surely this means Boxer supports Marco Rubio for president, right? Otherwise she's a racist.
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) March 19, 2013
https://twitter.com/ticogringopaisa/status/314081173859094530
Hmm. Based on her history of votes against minorities (hold her to her own race card-y rules), the answer is no.
@gabrielmalor What a surprise @BarbaraBoxer voted against Alberto Gonzales for AG. http://t.co/ErKQXosetc #Racist
— Michael Blum (@MichaelBlum3) March 19, 2013
Join the conversation as a VIP Member