Jake Tapper: Don’t Rush to Assign Motive to Synagogue-Ramming Muslim Man Who Opened...
MSNOW Blames Trump for U.S. Terror Attacks, Not the Dangerous Islamists Who Carried...
Seth Meyers Ridicules ‘Meat-Constipated’ Pete Hegseth With Assist From Jen Psaki Clip
Silent Spud: CNN’s Brian ‘Tater’ Stelter Avoids Addressing the Media Malpractice at His...
Norfolk Commonwealth's Attorney Blames 'Cult of Gun Absolutism' for Old Dominion Shooting
Not Shocking: Regular Churchgoers Thrive Mentally While Secular Liberals Struggle Most
Reporter Makes a Funny Out of Mamdani’s Wife Liking Posts About October 7
Dave Portnoy to Mamdani: Drop the Fake Horror—Your Wife's Probably Celebrating These Attac...
Three Norwegian Citizens 'With Links to Iraq' Bomb US Embassy in Oslo
Zohran Mamdani Dragged on X for Statement on Michigan Synagogue Attack
Three Salvadoran Nationals Charged With Possession of Molotov Cocktails in NYC
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand Demands Sen. Tommy Tuberville Apologize for Islamophobic Post
Vehicle Used in Attack on Synagogue Registered to US Citizen From Lebanon Who...
Trump Derangement Syndrome: Ed Krassenstein Cheers China's Ridicule of White House Prayer...
MS NOW Hosts Wonder If the Michigan Synagogue Attack Is the Fault of......

There is disbelief of DHS Secretary Mayorkas' claim that the new 'disinformation' board won't monitor American citizens

The claim that the Department of Homeland Security’s recently announced “disinformation board” will not monitor American citizens is being met with skepticism.

Advertisement

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas said “no” when asked by CNN’s ‘State of the Union’ if American citizens will be monitored by this board.

“We in the Department of Homeland Security don’t monitor American citizens,” Mayorkas continued. “The board does not have any operational authority or capability.”

Advertisement

That claim by the DHS chief is being questioned.

https://twitter.com/danieltobin/status/1520831192848900097

In the censorship-heavy current environment and considering the left’s track record on free speech, a sentiment of distrust regarding a new government tool that could conceivably be used as an obstacle to free speech or be used to suppress certain forms of speech should not be surprising.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement