Platner Platitudes: Dems Jeffries and Warnock Regurgitate ‘Voters’ Decide’ Slop for Maine...
President Trump: Iran Deal is Now Complete
Griftin' Hillary Strikes Again: Clutching Pearls at UFC While Shilling White House Coaster...
Biden Loyalist: Platner’s Nazi Tat, Wife-Beating, Pedo App & Rape Fantasies Aren’t Just...
Jon Gabriel Explains Two Definitions of America
DeSantis Deserves Better: Florida GOP Must Honor a Real Debate Before Replacing an...
Report: 12 Dead After Airplane Crash in Missouri
One Year Down, Eternity with Weiner’s Sloppy Seconds: Alex Soros & Huma’s Cringe...
USA! There Is Pride in America To Be Found, Poll Result Tweet Indicates
A STUDY for This? DUH: X's Reaction to Study Showing Conservatives Are Happier...
'So Turned ON': One of America’s Most BADASS Presidents Roars Back to Life...
'Cute Speech. CONGRATS': Mark Cuban Shuts Ro Khanna DOWN in SURPRISING Back and...
Smug Libs Melting Down Over UFC at Lincoln Memorial Get Brutal HISTORY Smackdown...
HA! Lefty's 'My Life Sucks Because There's a Trillionaire' Post Goes VIRAL for...
Get the NET! Check Out Popehat's Unhinged COLLAPSE on Lefty Utopia BlueSky Over...

There is disbelief of DHS Secretary Mayorkas' claim that the new 'disinformation' board won't monitor American citizens

The claim that the Department of Homeland Security’s recently announced “disinformation board” will not monitor American citizens is being met with skepticism.

Advertisement

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas said “no” when asked by CNN’s ‘State of the Union’ if American citizens will be monitored by this board.

“We in the Department of Homeland Security don’t monitor American citizens,” Mayorkas continued. “The board does not have any operational authority or capability.”

Advertisement

That claim by the DHS chief is being questioned.

https://twitter.com/danieltobin/status/1520831192848900097

In the censorship-heavy current environment and considering the left’s track record on free speech, a sentiment of distrust regarding a new government tool that could conceivably be used as an obstacle to free speech or be used to suppress certain forms of speech should not be surprising.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement