Prosecutor: No Threats, No Obsession — Acton Fair ‘Attack’ Suspect Just Wanted to...
It's Come to THIS? Frustrated Clancy Juror Explains What the Lone Holdout Just...
Atty Forgets to Click Off Gun Safety in Botched Ambush of Ex-Wife —...
Dem Senator Says Nobody in Her Party Wants Taxpayer-Funded Care for Illegals (Then...
Do-Gooder Professor Heroically Defends Her Cheap Illegal Gardener After ICE Rightfully Arr...
They Laughed When Conservatives Said They’d Come for Your Gas Stove ... San...
Pols of Privilege: Victor Davis Hanson Says Socialists in the Spotlight Owe Everything...
Female Lindsay Clancy Murder Trial Jurors Say Defense Attorney Was Funny and Entertaining...
Ashen Passion: Adam Carolla Shocked to Learn Anti-White Dems of Color Are Hooking...
Video Lets Us Experience Lindsay Clancy Trial Deliberations From Vantage Point of ‘Lone...
Hope Walz Says Republicans' Obsession With Old State Flag Is Like a Racist...
Appeals Court Says Administration's Argument to Allow the IRS to Share Data With...
A Call From the 83rd Floor, a Mother’s Life’s Work, and a...
MS NOW’s New Membership Service Allows Users to Talk to Rachel Maddow, Joe...
The Actual Problem in the Clancy Mistrial Wasn’t the Holdout — It Was...

Clean up, aisle 1! Marco Rubio clarifies his stance on GOP tax cuts

In an interview with the Economist last week, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said there was “no evidence whatsoever” that the Republican enacted tax cuts were helping American workers:

Advertisement

Full Rubio quote, via the Economist:

The watered-down version they accepted, as the price of Mr Rubio’s support for the bill, excluded the poorest families. “There is still a lot of thinking on the right that if big corporations are happy, they’re going to take the money they’re saving and reinvest it in American workers,” he says. “In fact they bought back shares, a few gave out bonuses; there’s no evidence whatsoever that the money’s been massively poured back into the American worker.”

And now for the clean up today in National Review:

Maybe he does this on purpose?

This is a pretty big flip-flop by any measure. For example, this is how it was being covered before today’s National Review op-ed:

Advertisement

And:

What’s even funnier is that the Economist didn’t really believe him when they tweeted this out on May 1 to promote the interview:

***

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos