CNN's Dana Bash Wonders If Kamala Harris Had Enough Time to Introduce Herself...
Joy Reid Says MSNBC Has Done Everything It Could to Save Us From...
Sen. Cory Booker Has Heard Guys Say Their Girlfriends Will Kill Them If...
Bomb Threats Delay Voting in DeKalb County, Georgia
Keeping An Eye On The Keystone State: Pesky Problems Plague Pennsylvania Polls
‘Based’ Mike Lee Argues That the Supreme Court Should Overturn a Major Precedent...
Dairy State Dispatch: Error Leads Milwaukee Election Officials to Reset, Recount 30k Absen...
Trump Denies Some Corporate Media Credentials to Tonight's (Hopefully!) Victory Party
LIVE: Election Night 2024
CBS News Reminds Voters That Election Disinformation Doesn't End After You Cast Your...
Andrew Mitchell Plays the Misogyny Card HARD When Explaining Kamala's Struggle With Male...
Silent Majority? Quiet Trump Voters are Making a Big Noise at the Ballot...
Dr. Jill Biden Just Voted in Delaware, but for Whom?
CNN's Chris Wallace Says It Would Take a 'Miracle' for Kamala to Win...
Dana Bash Thinks the SITTING VP Didn't Have Time to Introduce Herself to...

Lt. Gov. of Pennsylvania responds to the news that SCOTUS will hear Rep. Mike Kelly's case with a 'Simpsons' GIF

So, SCOTUS will hear the Pennsylvania case after all:

Advertisement

This is the lawsuit brought by Rep. Mike Kelly and Sean Parnell that was just dismissed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court:

More on that here:

Via BuzzFeed’s Zoe Tilman, “At this point, they’re asking for an injunction to stop PA state officials from doing anything to make Biden’s win official, and if it’s already happened, to nullify it — an extremely big ask, to say the least”:

Advertisement

Of note, Justice Alito asked for responses by December 9 which is *AFTER* the safe-harbor deadline:

It sure doesn’t sound like they’re in any rush to have this case matter:

The Lieutenant Gov. of Pennsylvania, John Fetterman, responded to the news with a “Simpsons” GIF:

Even worse, he’s comparing Pennsylvania Republicans to the New York Jets:

Advertisement

For comparison purposes, SCOTUS DID move faster in 2000 in Bush v. Gore:

Justice Alito could have “ordered a response before the deadline” if he had wanted to:

***

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement