Banner Year, Guys: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Owns the Democrats Simply by Describing Their...
Abigail Spanberger Claims She Had the BEST TIME at Old Fiddler's Convention (We...
What Is She UP to: Hillary Clinton Tries Pushing ANOTHER Trump Lie on...
CNN Hosts Triggered by Trump's Escape From Iranian Threat
The Barbarians Are at the Gates. And the Stakes Have Never Been Higher.
AWKWARD! Sooo ... ABOUT Those 'Republicans for Talarico'? Yeah, RIP to THAT Campaign...
WI Dem Explains WHY He's 'Unironically' Likely Voting R for Gov With DISTURBING...
Won't Someone PLEASE Think About the REPORTERS?! Jake Tapper Hits ALL New Self-Awareness...
Royce White Is Being Misgendered and It Needs to Stop RIGHT NOW
Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons Explaining How SECURITY Works to CNN...
WOW: Abdul El-Sayed Deliberately Hid a WHOLE LOT About Himself From Voters (Scrubbed...
Brandon Gill Drops a Whole Lotta OH HELL NO on AOC Trying to...
Former Daily Caller Employee Shares DAMNING Story of Finding Emails Tucker Carlson Sent...
UK Police Spray Man Carrying Newly Purchased Baseball Bat in Its Original Packaging
Haitian Man Collapses in Tears While Being Fitted With Ankle Monitor by ICE

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos