Jake Tapper Tattles on Trump for Calling Hakeem Jeffries Low-IQ and a Thug
MS NOW's Ken Dilanian Defends SPLC, Doesn't Know What a Grand Jury Is...
Karen Bass Mocks a Fire Victim Running for Mayor — And It Perfectly...
Sunny Hostin Says Obama Lives Rent-Free in Trump’s Head Because He’ll Never Win...
First-Grade Teacher: May Day Protest Is Really Cool Way to Teach K-6 How...
Matt Van Swol Has Words for Organizers of ‘Kids Over Corporations’ Rally That...
Bill Maher Reminds 'No Kings' Democrats That They're a Total Joke
Let's Flash Back to a Time When EVERY Late Night Show Host (and...
Elizabeth Warren Assigns Blame for JetBlue/Spirit Merger Getting Blocked Under Biden While...
WATCH: Poodles and Bullet-Proof Vests? President Trump's Got Jokes
'Arsonist and Firefighter' Elizabeth Warren Just Got Community Note Nuked Over Her 'Compet...
Sean Duffy Lambastes Elizabeth Warren and Team Biden in a Brutal Reality Check...
Watch the Look on Gavin Newsom's Face As Bill Maher Torches His High...
Guess What the AP Did NOT Mention in Their Story About Spirit Airlines...
Elizabeth Warren's 2-Year-Old 'Biden Win for Flyers' Brag Has Aged Wonderfully (So Has...

If the Second Amendment only applies to muskets ... tired narrative goes BOOM

Each time gun-grabbing is the Leftist movement of the moment, the same false narratives resurface. A popular epiphany among Democrats is the forefathers never envisioned modern-day arms when they wrote the Second Amendment. It is touted with a knowing air of superiority each and every time.

Advertisement

As though persons supporting the Second Amendment have no knowledge of its history or intent. Every manner of careful explanation and historical perspective has been shared with the anti-2A crowd, but they persist with condescending ‘gotcha’ points that are laughably inaccurate.

They really think they are onto something with this.

Other comparisons have been drawn, repeatedly, in an effort to demonstrate how unlikely it is that modernization changes the intent of carefully crafted Constitutional rights.

Not only can we debate the awareness of the potential development of more sophisticated weapons. There are gaping loopholes in the logic regarding the capabilities of certain arms that existed well before 1791.

Advertisement

Yes, cannons were around well before the notion of a Constitutional amendment that guaranteed citizens the right to bear arms.

There is nothing in the 2nd Amendment that expressly forbids specific weapons of choice.

https://twitter.com/VERBAL_CHANCLA/status/1536107483973816320?s=20&t=GtJ17vX7SjKTnVoeCKvx0A

Does the Left really want to give ideas to our arms-bearing friends who would be prepared to organize and defend themselves against tyranny as needed?

There are weapons that could potentially be more alarming than the modern AR-15.

While the plotting, pouncing, and mockery is fun, the angle was addressed in a 2016 US Supreme Court decision.

Everything is up for interpretation in the political arena though, so SCOTUS rulings aside, it wouldn’t hurt to cannon up folks!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement