The hacked John Podesta emails released by WikiLeaks have revealed all kinds of underhandedness, shady dealings and conflicts of interest, but Brit Hume spotted the Washington Post putting a nice pro-Clinton spin on them:
I never imagined you could do a puff piece about Podesta's emails, but @washingtonpost has done it. https://t.co/qtQsICtghh
— Brit Hume (@brithume) October 21, 2016
Hacks gonna hack!
The WAPO is totally in the tank for Hillary and is an extension of her campaign. No surprise.
— Alan R. McCartney (@Fasteagle101) October 21, 2016
Nope. No bias at all. Not one smidgen.
— Austin Millbarge (@Labredorresults) October 21, 2016
Ha ha loves risotto! https://t.co/R4x5GcH28i
— M. Valerius Corvus (@corvus_m) October 21, 2016
In the tank – hacks ALL#MAGA #MAGA3X https://t.co/9TTw5PeDY2
— Gregory Flap Cole (@Flap) October 21, 2016
I don't read @washingtonpost for 2 reasons, 1. they want you to pay/register 2. Paying them would be tacit support of their agenda! https://t.co/SIn4uQGPcC
— Dynadawg (@jagstachetrophy) October 21, 2016
Recommended
How about "He's calculating, deceitful, bitchy, small minded, and little more than HRC's lead stooge?" #better
— Tim (@submarinr1) October 21, 2016
https://twitter.com/locale40th/status/789494982801358848
The author of the article defended the piece against Hume’s mockery:
Just call me Puff Daddy. P.S. Have you read Podesta's e-mails? The one's *he* wrote? They're a snoozefest. https://t.co/45W4bRKitG
— Dan Zak (@MrDanZak) October 21, 2016
Join the conversation as a VIP Member