At today’s White House briefing, Josh Earnest was as predictable as ever after being asked if the Bill Clinton/Loretta Lynch meeting had at the very least the appearance of impropriety.
JUST IN: White House defends Lynch from Clinton meeting fallout https://t.co/pBbopZFNjC pic.twitter.com/RhtUHsUoZi
— The Hill (@thehill) June 30, 2016
.@PressSec repeatedly avoided direct answer on whether @LorettaLynch meeting with @billclinton had appearance of impropriety.
— Mark Knoller (@markknoller) June 30, 2016
So in other words:
I'll take that as a Yes. https://t.co/sVCZBeI4Bt
— Dusty (@dustopian) June 30, 2016
Bingo.
WH that endorsed candidate under FBI investigation defends own AG that met with candidates husband. See the problem? https://t.co/xaagpWYPga
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) June 30, 2016
The Obama administration and Team Clinton can’t admit to the appearance of impropriety, and there’s a reason for that:
and @LorettaLynch should know it’s at odds with the U.S. Attorney handbook https://t.co/XcIlfaIite
— DC Dude (@DCDude1776) June 30, 2016
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/748567917588058112
The transparency is truly “historic,” isn’t it?
They defended it and that's because it WAS improper. Plain and simple.
— Colorado RedTraci (@goptraci) June 30, 2016
Maybe it's no big deal on the Hill, but out here on the street it is evidence the fix is in.
— Jo Anne moretti (@JoAnneMoretti) June 30, 2016
https://twitter.com/TheRealBepo/status/748572610376704000
https://twitter.com/PostmasterBen/status/748583132392194048
by tomorrow it'll be racist to suggest there was anything wrong with this meeting https://t.co/5V53Mnd5tA
— DanRiehl (@DanRiehl) June 30, 2016
Join the conversation as a VIP Member