The Department of Justice has been asked to open an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s vanished email and server.
An article about it in the New York Times was changed without mention after it was published:
New York Times alters Clinton email story http://t.co/zu34nyJhCk
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) July 24, 2015
The headline and content of the article were later changed to soften any direct focus on Hillary. Why were the changes made? You’ll only need one guess:
Our brave gatekeepers of truth pic.twitter.com/qBFpa91e1s
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) July 24, 2015
Ask and ye shall receive.
Original @NYTimes Clinton email lede vs. rewritten lede pic.twitter.com/5yPkev3JNS
— Daily Kos Elections (@DKElections) July 24, 2015
Hillary says “jump” and they say “how high?”
As suspected, Hillaryland steamrolled NYT for a rewrite. RT @redsteeze: Our brave gatekeepers of truth pic.twitter.com/vjgMAVpJMN
— Jimmy (@JimmyPrinceton) July 24, 2015
@redsteeze Progmedia hacks are inclined to grovel before TeamHillary, but have extra incentive: bad things happen to those on her shitlist.
— Skin that smokewagon! (@heatpacker) July 24, 2015
Nothing to see here … just a political candidate telling a newspaper what to publish, and the paper obeying.
@redsteeze @instapundit They actually told the truth, Clinton didn't like it, so they softened the truth. Typical.
— The?FOO (@PolitiBunny) July 24, 2015
https://twitter.com/twitmadin/status/624567860174520320
I am sure they would do the same for the GOP. ( no they wouldn't and it would still be wrong) https://t.co/hmkv7PtFno
— PollyPhemous (@PollySpin) July 24, 2015
https://twitter.com/G8rRanger/status/624567857708445696
Good lapdoggie!
***
Related:
‘Wrong’: Ron Fournier demolishes Hillary Clinton’s email excuses & scapegoats
Join the conversation as a VIP Member