MS NOW Journo Stresses That Motive Is Still Unknown After Attempt to Crash...
Mahmoud Khalil Says America Broke Its Promise — Deport Him Quick Since It's...
Find Someone Who Loves You the Way the Media Loves Terrorists: Sick Spin...
Court Halts Christa Pike’s Execution An Hour Before She Was Due to Die...
The 'Death to America' People in Iran Have Made a US Midterm Election...
Jasmine Crockett Won’t Endorse Talarico — So a Fellow Democrat Told Her to...
Kat Rosenfield Reminds Everyone the Cornell 7 Haven’t Been Proven Guilty — and...
Here's Abdul El-Sayed Getting the Money Out of Politics by Raking It in...
A Manlet and His Girlfriend Busted After Lighting an Abandoned House on Fire...
Flydubai Co-Pilot Stabs Captain Midair — Israeli Passengers Subdue Him Before the Plane...
Stephen Miller Blasts CNN's Propaganda Effort About Children at Immigration Court
No Cash Bail Leaves a Pittsburgh Doctor Dead and a Growing Scandal Over...
The Supreme Court Rules on Deportations to Third-Party Countries (LAWSPLAINING)
UK Home Secretary Reopening Resettlement Schemes for Palestinians Who Have Fled the Horror...
Sen. Mark Warner Says 100,000 Virginians Have Been Kicked Off of SNAP Because...

Father banned from school grounds after complaining about sexually explicit book

The word “pornographic” gets put in scare quotes a lot (like right here) when discussing books that are finding their way into schools’ libraries and recommended reading lists. “Gender Queer” is probably the most cited, but we’ve never run a picture of the offending pages because, well, they’re pornographic … but easily found on Twitter. “Blankets” is another graphic novel, and we’ll run a picture of the inside, only because it’s less explicit (and the pictures are small enough that you can’t make out all of the penises).

Advertisement

Libs of TikTok reports that a father was banned from school grounds after complaining at a school board meeting about “Blankets.” “… it has been determined that you have committed one or more acts that interfere with the peaceful conduct of activities on District property,” the letter from the superintendent reads. “Should you fail to leave the school grounds immediately … the School District will have no alternative but to take such legal action as is necessary to maintain a peaceful educational and work environment.”

This must be one of those domestic terrorists Attorney General Merrick Garland was warning us about.

Advertisement

Good news, everyone …

From the article:

Timothy Reiland, a parent of two children who attend Owasso Public Schools, recently became upset after his daughter checked out a book, “Blankets,” from the Owasso school library. Reiland considered portions of the book to be pornographic.

As a result, he began advocating for the school to alter its library policies. When the Owasso school board held its Oct. 12 board meeting, Reiland was in attendance, believing the board was prepared to vote on a new policy that would restrict “pornographic content” from the school library.

Instead, the policy presented did not include a pornographic restriction and the board members tabled the vote. Board members instead announced the issue would be taken up at a special meeting closed to the public.

Following the meeting, Reiland spoke to Owasso school board member Brent England in the school parking lot. The exchange included the use of profanity but was not violent, according to witness accounts referenced in the judge’s order.

Advertisement

So profanity in a conversation with a school board member is a bannable offense, but pornographic books in the school library are fine. Is is too much to ask that books be age-appropriate?

***

Editor’s Note: Republican voters deserve answers and accountability for the failed red wave.

Join Twitchy VIP and support our effort to tell the truth. Use the promo code VIPWEEK to get 45% off a VIP membership!

Related:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement