As Twitchy reported this week, 2020 presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard fired back — hard — at Hillary Clinton, “queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption, and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long,” after Clinton said in an interview that Gabbard was a Russian asset being set up to run a third-party campaign and siphon votes from the Democratic candidate.
We have our disagreements with Van Jones, but we respect him for telling CNN’s Erin Burnett that Clinton is playing “a very dangerous game” and that if she has evidence, show it.
Van Jones: "I’m telling you, Hillary Clinton is playing a very dangerous game… If you’ve got real evidence, come forward with it. But if you’re just going to smear people casually on podcasts, you are playing right into the Russians’ hands" https://t.co/ma82IikqS7
— Saagar Enjeti (@esaagar) October 19, 2019
He’s absolutely right. Who needs the Russians to do anything if people like Clinton are going to keep the paranoia and false accusations going without their help?
This is true. True for Hillary but also very true for an irresponsible media that for nearly 3 yrs carried water for Putin in pushing the Russian collusion fairytale. Putin didn’t destabilize our democracy: the collusion mongers did because they chose to push it. https://t.co/OIbSPQS2sy
— Ned Ryun (@nedryun) October 19, 2019
Well said. Never mind the Mueller report — there are probably millions who honestly believe Russia somehow installed Donald Trump in the Oval Office … not through collusion, though, but through the purchase of a few Facebook memes.
This is an excellent, excellent comment…
— TheThinker (@TheRewster) October 19, 2019
Recommended
She had the evidence on her email server.
— Bondage Dividend (@Disquietous) October 19, 2019
Good one.
Apparently the new take on being a Russian asset is that the asset doesn’t have to be paid by Russia, or in fact even know that Russia has made them an asset, to in fact be an asset. Truly.
— NH (@NomadHominem) October 19, 2019
Van Jones must have been away for the last 3 years. Doesn’t he know what his beloved party has become these days?
— Stan Shtramel (@sshtramel) October 19, 2019
It's hard for me to like and retweet this because Van is somehow still perpetuating the Russiagate narrative… But I will anyway because at least he's not giving Hillary her usual blank cheque.
— Paxxwell (@Paxxwell) October 19, 2019
Same
— April Ngo (@aprilmay_n) October 19, 2019
@VanJones68 is gonna get himself booted if he keeps spitting all these facts
— Brandon Reyes ? (@breyescu18) October 19, 2019
Where in the hell was that kind of rational thinking for the last 3 years?!
— Cʜᴜᴄᴋ Fʟᴇᴛᴄʜᴇʀ (Ciucc to the nooch) (@RealGuitarDood) October 19, 2019
He was on his way to saying something truly profound and then right at the end he remembered he really loves that CNN gig.
— Childless GenX LaCroix Aunt Voter (@koalatwin) October 19, 2019
Resistance Queen is destroying Resistance. ?
— Aisha Sharna (@SharnaAisha) October 19, 2019
I remember when Mitt Romney was roundly criticized for claiming that Russia was our biggest threat.
— Greggo (@GregGreggo) October 19, 2019
When did real life become a reddit thread where we accuse people of being Russian bots right and left? I don’t even like Tulsi and I think this is nuts.
— LetsAnthropomorphize??? (@LetsAnthrpmrphz) October 19, 2019
Hillary believes it, so it is nuts.
Related:
'The queen of warmongers': Tulsi Gabbard just responded to Hillary Clinton and it's AMAZING https://t.co/CAHeL1EYWk
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) October 18, 2019
Join the conversation as a VIP Member