Sure, they’re rioting in the streets in Portland, blocking highways in Miami, and laying siege to Trump Tower, but let’s talk about feelings for a second.
Brian Fallon of Hillary for America is probably hurting a little right now, but rather than offer words of comfort, check out how Kellyanne Conway responded to his pre-election tweet days later.
With early vote in NV looking strong, if Clinton also holds MI, it forces Trump to run table in OH-PA-NC-FL. https://t.co/w9ypHcOls5
— Brian Fallon (@brianefallon) November 5, 2016
Thanks for the tip – we ran the four-state OH-PA-NC-FL table indeed and added MI in for good measure. https://t.co/5O3yOy9Sj5
— Kellyanne Conway (@KellyannePolls) November 11, 2016
That’s cold. CNN’s Andrew Kaczynski has a question, though he might have intended it to be rhetorical.
https://twitter.com/KFILE/status/797479692018257925
sending the signal that the operating ethos of the new president's team will be revenge, grudges and recriminations.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 12, 2016
Clearly, the promise of the new administration being in any way conciliatory is only the latest in the daily litany of lies.
— Kindler (@progressive_va) November 12, 2016
She needs a nap. Or a vacation. Her tweets today are vindictive and absurd.
— Jeremy Stanley (@jeremystanley) November 12, 2016
It’s all that they know.
— David Morton (@itypewords) November 12, 2016
because she's a classless Stepford racist
— ?? Blue Wave Amnon ?? (@IsraelSoccerGuy) November 12, 2016
The raison d'être of the entire campaign was sadism. Inflicting pain on liberals and POC. People voted in droves to do that.
— AlanRLibforLife (@AlanR00FER) November 12, 2016
people who spend a lot of time together start morphing into each other, right? We can see the shape this administration will take
— Kelly Allen (@kellakelWV) November 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/TheStagmania/status/797483182488748034
They'll need this as a defense for their actions: we won, you lost, deal with it. The opposition is undemocratic.
— ThisWontEndWell (@talkingnewmedia) November 12, 2016
Hold up a sec … that “we won, you lost, deal with it” sounds awfully familiar. But why?
https://twitter.com/drewinhawaii/status/797583610488426496
https://twitter.com/Jazzizhep/status/797505721927614464
https://twitter.com/Jazzizhep/status/797509208719687680
Oh yeah, that. It sounded so much more gracious and conciliatory when Obama said it, though. But back to the question: why rub it in like that? What’s the point?
the point is suck it
— BDJinCO (@DissidentBiker) November 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/ArizonaLuke/status/797481250843860992
https://twitter.com/JeremyAEllis/status/797481175539478530
Not rubbing in. Just being proud of the great job she did.
— mwitch (@mwitticg) November 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/NWMolloy/status/797565416243482625
https://twitter.com/nymjr7/status/797484478826422272
After the arrogance and ignorance of the #MSM over the last year, it's the least that should be done. I'm being polite.
— Zunnar ?? (@Chadrl) November 12, 2016
https://twitter.com/ryanvanfleet83/status/797568015181156352
What with facts? Probably because she earned it. Something Libs have issues with. She gets the trophy you don't. @KellyannePolls
— 1️⃣7️⃣CivilianPatriot️7️⃣6️⃣ (@civilianpat) November 12, 2016
'Rubbing salt in a wound' results in the lesson derived from said wound being remembered by the dipshit that got wounded.
— @LSC1776 on gab.ai (@LSC1776) November 12, 2016
They deserve to spike the ball a little. The arrogance from the Clinton campaign and the media requires it. Their defeat was historic
— Benjam (@benjamuniverse) November 12, 2016
I guess it's possible she could have said elections have consequences. ?
— Steven with a V (@813Steven) November 13, 2016
Oh please…if Hillary had won you all would be pouring salt into the wounds…Get over it…Trump WON this one!
— Susan Reaney (@SSReaney) November 12, 2016
Join the conversation as a VIP Member