Texas Loser John Cornyn Tries to Insult Scott Presler and, Yeah, THAT Didn't...
And Then There’s Fraud: Jeffries Says California’s Elections Are Secure But Trump Is...
Debt Wish: Dem Ayanna Pressley Wants Reparations and MAGA Is Begging Her to...
Scott Jennings Reminds Karen Finney She Worked for Bill Clinton During Her ‘Character...
UK Politician Claims Elon Musk Orchestrated the Riot in Belfast After Beheading Attempt
Boston Police Searching for Suspects in Armed Robbery of Lemonade Stand
Former Court Clerks Arrested for Allegedly Helping Illegals Evade ICE
Thank You, European Soccer Fans, for Reminding Us How Great America Actually Is
Professor Blames Austin Metcalf’s Father for Not Teaching His Son ‘Black Boys Have...
ABC News Show Riot Damage After Asylum Seeker ‘Allegedly Attacked Another Person With...
NBC News: Burning Cross in Chicago Park Shocks Residents; January 6 Connection?
Ryan Grim: Republicans Looked Silly When ‘Nazi Tattoo’ Turned Out Not to Be...
What Stuck Out to Karmelo Anthony’s Father Was the ‘All-White Jury’
World Cup Tourists Find Surreal Sporting Goods Store With a Firing Range; Also...
Gavin Newsom's 'Donald Trump's Dream' Video Melts All Remaining Projection Detectors

New York Times runs 'quit Catholicism' ad, refuses to run 'quit Islam' equivalent

Breitbart.com on Pamela Geller’s latest exposure of MSM and governmental double standards:

The New York Times has explained its double standard for running paid advertisements attacking different religions with concern for the safety of America’s soldiers.

After running the atheist organization Freedom From Religion’s ad telling readers “It’s time to consider quitting the Catholic Church,” Pamela Geller of the organization Stop Islamization of America created a parody ad stating “It’s time to quit Islam.” The Daily Caller reports:

According to a Mar. 13 letter sent by the Times to… Geller, the $39,000 anti-Islam ad was rejected because “the fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.”

This is the same New York Times which published details of the Wikileaks documents leaked by Bradley Manning in 2010. The Times justified its decision to publish the details of the documents, stating that it removed information which could lead to the targeting of individual operatives:

The Times and the other news organizations agreed at the outset that we would not disclose — either in our articles or any of our online supplementary material — anything that was likely to put lives at risk or jeopardize military or antiterrorist operations. We have, for example, withheld any names of operatives in the field and informants cited in the reports.

But by publishing stories from these documents such as alleged murders of civilians, including a pregnant woman, the Times engaged in the same kind of general incitement against American troops the paper now cites in its rejection of Geller’s ad.

Advertisement

Read the whole thing.

The New York Times won’t print it because of its concern for US soldiers in harms way? They make us laugh.

Isn’t it time you quit the Times?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement