Alyssa Farah Griffin Giggles Over 'Crazy Woke 1' — Forgets the Jobs and...
Scott Galloway Says Gavin Newsom Will Be Dems’ 2028 Presidential Pick for All...
Banner Year, Guys: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Owns the Democrats Simply by Describing Their...
Abigail Spanberger Claims She Had the BEST TIME at Old Fiddler's Convention (We...
What Is She UP to: Hillary Clinton Tries Pushing ANOTHER Trump Lie on...
CNN Hosts Triggered by Trump's Escape From Iranian Threat
The Barbarians Are at the Gates. And the Stakes Have Never Been Higher.
AWKWARD! Sooo ... ABOUT Those 'Republicans for Talarico'? Yeah, RIP to THAT Campaign...
WI Dem Explains WHY He's 'Unironically' Likely Voting R for Gov With DISTURBING...
Won't Someone PLEASE Think About the REPORTERS?! Jake Tapper Hits ALL New Self-Awareness...
Royce White Is Being Misgendered and It Needs to Stop RIGHT NOW
Scott Jennings Breaks Out Puppets and Crayons Explaining How SECURITY Works to CNN...
WOW: Abdul El-Sayed Deliberately Hid a WHOLE LOT About Himself From Voters (Scrubbed...
Brandon Gill Drops a Whole Lotta OH HELL NO on AOC Trying to...
Former Daily Caller Employee Shares DAMNING Story of Finding Emails Tucker Carlson Sent...

New York Times runs 'quit Catholicism' ad, refuses to run 'quit Islam' equivalent

Breitbart.com on Pamela Geller’s latest exposure of MSM and governmental double standards:

The New York Times has explained its double standard for running paid advertisements attacking different religions with concern for the safety of America’s soldiers.

After running the atheist organization Freedom From Religion’s ad telling readers “It’s time to consider quitting the Catholic Church,” Pamela Geller of the organization Stop Islamization of America created a parody ad stating “It’s time to quit Islam.” The Daily Caller reports:

According to a Mar. 13 letter sent by the Times to… Geller, the $39,000 anti-Islam ad was rejected because “the fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.”

This is the same New York Times which published details of the Wikileaks documents leaked by Bradley Manning in 2010. The Times justified its decision to publish the details of the documents, stating that it removed information which could lead to the targeting of individual operatives:

The Times and the other news organizations agreed at the outset that we would not disclose — either in our articles or any of our online supplementary material — anything that was likely to put lives at risk or jeopardize military or antiterrorist operations. We have, for example, withheld any names of operatives in the field and informants cited in the reports.

But by publishing stories from these documents such as alleged murders of civilians, including a pregnant woman, the Times engaged in the same kind of general incitement against American troops the paper now cites in its rejection of Geller’s ad.

Advertisement

Read the whole thing.

The New York Times won’t print it because of its concern for US soldiers in harms way? They make us laugh.

Isn’t it time you quit the Times?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos