Eric Swalwell Suspends Calif. Gubernatorial Campaign and Now EVERYBODY Has the Same Questi...
Dem Robert Garcia Wants Eric Swalwell to Leave CA Governor’s Race, Silent on...
Report: Artemis II Pilot Makes a Point of Thanking God
Sen. Rick Scott Trumpets Busting the Filibuster
WATCH Mark Warner Squirm As CNN's Dana Bash Asks Him As a Democrat...
Meghan McCain Shuts TDS-Inflicted Barbara Comstock DOWN in BRUTAL Back and Forth About...
In Case Your Skin Hasn't Crawled ENOUGH Already --> Check Out Eric Swalwell's...
WTAF, Daily Caller?! MAGA Is MAGA - There Is No Old Versus New,...
'Lots of Stuff RUMBLING': Eric Swalwell's BFF Ruben Gallego Should Probably Just Go...
WEAK! Lefty Journo LASHES Out As X Slams Him for Bragging That He...
Rejection Letter: Eric Swalwell’s Campaign and Congressional Staff Denounce Him in New Sta...
TPUSA Reporter Savanah Hernandez Assaulted at Anti-ICE Protest
Graham Platner: I Came Out of a ‘Hyper-Masculine, Hyper-Violent Place’ When I Left...
Powerful: Blindfolded Women Perform Protest Dance Aimed at Trump and Epstein
Sen. Mike Lee Agrees It Might Be Time to Put James Carville in...

New York Times runs 'quit Catholicism' ad, refuses to run 'quit Islam' equivalent

Breitbart.com on Pamela Geller’s latest exposure of MSM and governmental double standards:

The New York Times has explained its double standard for running paid advertisements attacking different religions with concern for the safety of America’s soldiers.

After running the atheist organization Freedom From Religion’s ad telling readers “It’s time to consider quitting the Catholic Church,” Pamela Geller of the organization Stop Islamization of America created a parody ad stating “It’s time to quit Islam.” The Daily Caller reports:

According to a Mar. 13 letter sent by the Times to… Geller, the $39,000 anti-Islam ad was rejected because “the fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.”

This is the same New York Times which published details of the Wikileaks documents leaked by Bradley Manning in 2010. The Times justified its decision to publish the details of the documents, stating that it removed information which could lead to the targeting of individual operatives:

The Times and the other news organizations agreed at the outset that we would not disclose — either in our articles or any of our online supplementary material — anything that was likely to put lives at risk or jeopardize military or antiterrorist operations. We have, for example, withheld any names of operatives in the field and informants cited in the reports.

But by publishing stories from these documents such as alleged murders of civilians, including a pregnant woman, the Times engaged in the same kind of general incitement against American troops the paper now cites in its rejection of Geller’s ad.

Advertisement

Read the whole thing.

The New York Times won’t print it because of its concern for US soldiers in harms way? They make us laugh.

Isn’t it time you quit the Times?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement