MS NOW Host Covering WHCA Says Trump Had to ‘Convince’ Americans to Distrust...
WHCA Dinner With Whine: CNN’s Brian Stelter Blames Trump for Damaging Public’s Trust...
Ben Shapiro Schools Piers Morgan: Free Speech Means I Don't Have to Feed...
Real Christian Care Is Personal—Not Political Force
Obama Fanboy Axelrod Deletes Outrage Post After Falling for Fake Trump Gold Coin...
Cecilia Vega Mad She Got Fired for Defying CBS Bosses and Whined About...
From Cocky Troll to Sudden Sage: Katz Rewrites Himself From Platner’s Hype Man...
Whitmer Endorses Haley Stevens in MI Senate Primary ... Hamas Caucus Hardest Hit
Hamas Caucus of the Dem Party Melts Down as DNC Crowns South Carolina...
USA Today: Caitlin Clark Skipped Orange Carpet for a Blowout ... It Was...
Randy Fine Putting the Senate on FAFO Notice for Not Even TRYING to...
CNN’s Abby Phillip Gets Schooled by Halperin for Excusing Illegal Voters
Mike Lee's Thread Puts HEAP BIG Hurtin' on Liz Warren for Pushing Another...
Trump DOJ Confirms Investigation Into New Jersey Voter Rolls
Rand Paul Drops Damning, DEET-FILLED Thread About the Actual Origins of COVID and...

Snopes' 'Mostly False' rating for Free Beacon's reporting on Biden admin's crack pipe care packages kicks off 'the wildest fact check I've ever seen'

Earlier this week, the Washington Free Beacon’s Patrick Hauf made waves with his shocking scoop on the Biden administration’s plan to distribute crack pipes to drug addicts in the name of “racial equity.”

Advertisement

This is a very, very bad look for the Biden administration. As if they needed more very, very bad looks.

Advertisement

HHS may have their hands full, but you know who’s still got space in their schedule? Snopes, baby. Snopes has got Joe Biden’s back:

Here’s what Dan McGuill has to say about Hauf’s reporting and the “right-leaning outlets” sharing it:

Collectively, these articles gave readers a grossly misleading and reductive presentation of what was a real substance abuse harm reduction grant overseen by the Biden administration in early 2022. We are issuing a rating of “Mostly False.”

OK, Dan. OK, Snopes. What, exactly, makes the reports “Mostly False”? Inquiring minds wanna know:

It’s true that the grant description required the provision of smoking kits — an established component of harm reduction strategy — but in reality, those kits constituted just one of several sub-components of an even longer list of requirements for grant recipients. In other words, while outraged media coverage focused almost exclusively on “crack pipes,” this was actually only a very small part of the program.

Secondly, the provision of safer smoking supplies did not have as its purpose advancing the cause of racial equity. Rather, its purpose was, quite logically, to reduce harm and infection among existing drug users. However, the grant description did state that priority would be given to applicants who serve communities that are historically underserved. In other words, the grant’s terms encouraged recipients to advance racial equity while working for harm reduction, not the other way round — a crucial distinction which many outlets got wrong.

Advertisement

In other words:

Did Snopes take some kind of weird blood oath that they would defend the Biden administration no matter what?

Yeah … real head-scratcher, that.

Advertisement

Apparently Dan McGuill and Snopes just didn’t bother reading Hauf’s original report.

Fact-check: Totally true.

***

Update:

Looks like Facebook’s getting in on it, too:

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement