UK Charity Trying to Understand Decision to Deny Access to a Boat Carrying...
UK: Feminist MP Who Campaigned Against Men-Only Clubs Joins Gender-Segregated Muslim March
Vanity Fair: New Doc Says Elon Musk Had ‘A Degree of Certainty’ About...
Fetterman Crosses the Aisle: Democratic Senator Praises Trump at RNC, Infuriates His Own...
Gubernatorial Candidate Says Her Pronouns Are Mom, Texan, and Soon-To-Be Governor
Pray the Grounded Girls Get Chosen Before the Bitter Ones Hoard the Good...
'I'm Saving Your Number': CBS' Gayle King Fangirls Over Lindsay Clancy's Attorney
Hunter Biden Launches $LAPTOP Memecoin, Which Crashes 99 Percent Two Hours After Launch
Brian Stelter Has a Pic From the Packed House at Oliver Darcy's 'Information...
Mehdi Hasan Wants Apologies From Those Who Insisted War Would Stop If Hamas...
FAIL: James Talarico Tries to Convince a Reporter He No Longer Believes All...
Joe Scarborough: White House Will Hate the Success of Tennis Star From S**thole...
Those CREEPY HANDS! Gavin Newsom Scolds JD Vance While Bragging About Healthcare for...
‘Let’s Roll’: Flight 93 Hero Todd Beamer’s Father Endorses Mike Rogers — ‘Vote...
Ted Cruz Cites CNN's Reporting on James Talarico (Kaitlan Collins Runs Cover for...

Twitter takes down 'threat of violence' against Beto O'Rourke but leaves these alone for some reason

As Twitchy told you, Texas State Rep. Briscoe Cain responded to Beto O’Rourke’s vow to “take your AR-15” like so:

Beto branded that tweet a “death threat.” And apparently Twitter agreed:

Advertisement

It does, does it?

Here’s the thing: If Twitter wants to label Cain’s tweet as a “threat of violence,” that’s fine. But how about a little consistency?

What is “Hell yeah, we’re going to take your AR-15” by any means necessary if it’s not a threat of violence?

Good question.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement