Twitter Reminds Mopey 'Pod Bro' Jon Favreau What Obama ACTUALLY Brought About
Burning Down the House? Biden Loosens Immigration Requirements Prior to Leaving Office
Big Bad Denver, Colorado Mayor Says He Will Protect Illegals From the Federal...
Taylor Lorenz's Reasoning for Why She LOVES the Vibe on Bluesky Made Me...
J.K. Rowling - $7.7 Billion, Trans Activists - Zero: HBO Stands by Rowling...
It's Not the Most Wonderful Time of the Year for Joy Behar and...
Is Chick-Fil-A in the Room With You? MN Hospital Praises 'Courageous' Workers for...
Biden Regime Leaders Flee DC As Trump Prepares to Fire Them All!
Dem NM Gov Won't Cooperate With Trump Deportations (Tom Homan Had a Reminder...
BOOMITY! Elon Musk's Post About What Karma REALLY Looks Like Will Definitely Leave...
A Wildcard Wednesday Whoop A** on Elites
'Unfairly Becoming a Distraction': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From Attorney General Consideratio...
And We're Officially DEAD: Don't Look Now BUT Rob Reiner Just Basically Committed...
AP: Court Overturns Jussie Smollett's Conviction for 'Staging a Racist and Homophobic Atta...
Who They REALLY Are: Thread Shows UNHINGED Trans Activists Attacking Sarah McBride for...

'OUTRAGEOUS'! MGM Resorts' latest response to Las Vegas shooting sparks new 'PR NIGHTMARE'

As we approach the first anniversary of the deadly mass shooting in Las Vegas, killer Stephen Paddock’s motives remain as much a mystery as ever.

And speaking of mysterious motives, MGM Resorts International, which owns Mandalay Bay and the venue where the shooting occurred, is pre-emptively suing the survivors in the hopes of staving off future lawsuits against themselves:

Advertisement

The company, which owns Mandalay Bay and the Route 91 Harvest festival venue, argues that it cannot be held liable for Oct. 1 deaths, injuries or other damages, adding that any claims against MGM parties “must be dismissed,” according to complaints filed Friday in Nevada and California.

MGM is a Nevada company, so any lawsuits belong in state court, [Las Vegas attorney Robert] Eglet said. He viewed the decision to file the complaints in federal court as a “blatant display of judge shopping” that “quite frankly verges on unethical.”

“I’ve never seen a more outrageous thing, where they sue the victims in an effort to find a judge they like,” he said. “It’s just really sad that they would stoop to this level.”

It’s hard to argue with that assessment.

https://twitter.com/ConexAlway/status/1019219415731261440

Advertisement

Optics don’t get much worse than this.

https://twitter.com/nathantimmel/status/1019236619566673920

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement