At yesterday’s Golden Globes, Al Roker couldn’t help but notice the majorly beefed-up security:
I have never seen security like this for the @goldenglobes Checkpoint after checkpoint. They are not kidding around. And that’s good.
— Al Roker (@alroker) January 7, 2018
That’s good for all the celebrities.
Must be nice.
— cphily4u (@cphily4u) January 7, 2018
But what about all everyday citizens who can’t afford security detail and just want to protect themselves?
https://twitter.com/Hermicane3/status/950361425888899073
Oh, I thought Hollywood hacks are against anyone owning guns???
— adorable deplorable (@LIdeplorable) January 7, 2018
Guns for me, but not for thee.
https://twitter.com/ArthurSchwartz/status/950108715948085248
Hardly seems fair, does it?
Guns to protect the rich and famous but lowly ordinary citizens not so much?
— MammaMia! (@Dima_Tology) January 8, 2018
https://twitter.com/machetetweets1/status/950228489898250241
Hey @alroker I’m glad you see that’s good. For you. What about us? #2A #MAGA
— xrey (@xrey1) January 8, 2018
And yet they want all of us to give up our 2A rights. #hypocrites
— Lynette (@brittandbay) January 8, 2018
So Hollywood can have there arms, but every time I turn around these same liberals, want to take away citizens arms. Crazy. Not mine. #2A
— Larry Calhoun (@LBoogy31) January 7, 2018
Celebrities believe Americans shouldn't have guns for protection but they have fully armed body guards and armed limo drivers and live in armed gated areas.
When celebrities arm their guards with slingshots, then they can preach to me about guns.— Starr LaEarth (@SEarth0001) January 8, 2018
Here’s a reasonable exit question:
Why is such tight security needed? I thought everyone loves, admires and respects the Hollywood crowd.???
— Deplorable Coal Peep ⭐⭐⭐ (@wvufanagent99) January 7, 2018
Join the conversation as a VIP Member