Gizmodo’s Matt Novak has a big beef with this piece at The Federalist:
Dear feminists, stop pretending that birth control is necessary for one's health. https://t.co/F2opYpMtiL
— The Federalist (@FDRLST) November 3, 2017
Because The Federalist is a real bastion of male chauvinism, you guys:
Does the Federalist have a single woman writer? Have any of the men there ever had a conversation with a woman? https://t.co/Z0BC5zkK9B
— Matt Novak (@paleofuture) November 3, 2017
Excellent question, Matt. Truly.
monorail… Monorail… MONORAIL!
ratio… Ratio… RATIO! https://t.co/tSN5IA0T6W
— Cuffy (@CuffyMeh) November 3, 2017
#Ratio pic.twitter.com/Ok5lUTlXDJ
— EducatédHillbilly™ (@RobProvince) November 3, 2017
Wow. What’s the deal with that ratio, huh?
Oh:
We’re a majority female staff, Mr. Man. I’m senior editor. https://t.co/NobePxyPsw
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 3, 2017
Most of their writers are women.
— Lyndsey Fifield (@lyndseyfifield) November 3, 2017
lol do you Google bro? https://t.co/yZUr12cJnG
— Philip Wegmann (@PhilipWegmann) November 3, 2017
Reading beyond headlines is as hard as using Google?
— Michelle Ray (@GaltsGirl) November 3, 2017
Do @Gizmodo folks know how to click a link and read a byline?
— David Mastio (@DavidMastio) November 3, 2017
That’s too much work.
Identity politics has degraded to the point where the crazies don't even look at who they're demanding racial or sexual conformity from https://t.co/TuJPG7642s
— John Hayward (@Doc_0) November 3, 2017
Seriously:
check the byline genius https://t.co/sLS3IByKKQ
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) November 3, 2017
Not a Federalist fan, but they do have women writers.
In fact, the article in the tweet you're quoting? Written by a woman. https://t.co/L4q4bGDU5b
— RBe (@RBPundit) November 3, 2017
The article, which you clearly didn't read, was written by a woman. https://t.co/YQxVYq0IxC
— Erielle Davidson (@politicalelle) November 3, 2017
The author of the article in question 👇🏽😂 pic.twitter.com/bdox8KSj4p
— Jay Westmore 🇺🇸 (@JayWestmore) November 3, 2017
The article literally says, "As a woman who has taken contraception for health-related reasons …." Come on.
— Corie Whalen (@CorieWhalen) November 3, 2017
Some men don't like that @FDRLST gives voice to the large sector of women they would prefer to pretend don't exist. https://t.co/x2bnehBLpj
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) November 3, 2017
The woman who wrote the piece is a woman, with womanly attributes and a woman's perspective and everything.
— Dan Sheehan (@LVStories) November 3, 2017
Gosh, Matt. That’s embarrassing, isn’t it?
This is what is called a “self own” Matt. Also see: own goal…… pic.twitter.com/9YjyKiIsG9
— EducatédHillbilly™ (@RobProvince) November 3, 2017
That is a serious self-own right there.
— Physics Geek (@physicsgeek) November 3, 2017
This is one of the best self-owns I've seen in a while, but Gizmodo has a low, low bar. https://t.co/HVYtlampZh
— Nathan Wurtzel (@NathanWurtzel) November 3, 2017
This is your daily reminder that @Gizmodo was a Gawker property. So there’s that.
— EducatédHillbilly™ (@RobProvince) November 3, 2017
It’s true.
I missed it–have you yet acknowledged having issued what may literally be the dumbest Tweet in the history of this site? https://t.co/sLS3IByKKQ
— John Podhoretz (@jpodhoretz) November 3, 2017
Not as of this post’s publication, no. But he did tweet this:
As editor in chief of @FDRLST I'd just like to say that the pee tape is real and our enormous wet president screened it for me personally
— Matt Novak (@paleofuture) November 3, 2017
Mkaaaaay.
Some people might go sit in a corner after dunking on themselves this badly. But not this hero https://t.co/7gIYyhkyRQ
— David Rutz (@DavidRutz) November 3, 2017
Next time, Matt, just crawl into a cave. That would be much more dignified.
Editor’s note: This post has been updated with an additional tweet.
