The latest round of Democratic chest-thumping is centered around their 'pragmatic super moderate' Governor Abigail Spanberger signing a Virginia bill that supposedly bans domestic abusers from owning firearms, complete with the predictable dig that nearly every Republican voted against it. The implication is clear: the GOP must secretly want violent partners packing heat.
Reality check time.
Federal law has barred people convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence from possessing guns since the 1996 Lautenberg Amendment. Virginia already restricted firearms for those convicted of assaulting family or household members and for people under protective orders. What this particular measure does is expand the definition to cover certain dating or intimate partners who fell outside the previous “family or household” language — the so-called boyfriend loophole. It is a definitional tweak, not the invention of a brand-new prohibition.
🚨 Gov. Spanberger signs bill banning domestic abusers from owning firearms in Virginia.
— Democrats Deliver (@DemzDeliver) August 22, 2026
Nearly every Republican voted no. pic.twitter.com/7SF2oEZCh3
Framing Republican opposition as a vote for abusers is the classic rhetorical move. Any resistance to broadening gun bans gets cast as heartlessness, while the underlying questions about due process, temporary orders that can be issued with limited evidence, and whether yet another restriction actually keeps guns out of the hands of people determined to break the law get ignored. Criminals bent on violence tend not to consult the statute books before acting.
The account pushing this is in full “Democrats deliver” mode, treating the signing like a seismic breakthrough. Sources note the bill closed a technical gap and aligned state rules more closely with federal ones, with some bipartisan elements reported along the way. Yet the social media version prefers the stark “nearly every Republican voted no” line, complete with a smiling portrait of the governor next to a wall of firearms for maximum visual contrast.
Recommended
If the objective is genuine safety for victims, enforcing the laws already on the books, improving prosecution rates, and addressing the root causes of domestic violence would seem more productive than another incremental expansion that mainly serves as campaign material. Instead we get the familiar script: pass a measure, declare victory over the evil gun lobby, and move on.
Yawn.
The pattern never changes.
============================================================
Related:
NYC Legal Immigrants Are Working Together to STICK IT to Zohran Mamdani and We Are Here FOR IT
Oh, Honey... NO! Jessica Tarlov Plays Stupid Games With Stupid Posts in Lame Canada Dunk on Trump
OOF: David Axelrod's Ugly Swing at Natalie Harp Hits Barack Obama RIGHT in His Valerie Jarrett
Abdul El-Sayed Scrambles As Old Video Surfaces of Him Blaming America for Creating Terrorism -WATCH
'Still a LOSER': Fired Kirk-Hating Journo CHEERS Forcing WaPo to Take Her Disgusting Self Back
DELISH — > Lefties/Democrats DOG-WALK Mehdi Hasan for 'RACIST' Attack on Hakeem Jeffries and TEEHEE
============================================================
