Axios wrote a piece about Elon Musk suspending journalists for stalking his toddler claiming it was ‘unprecedented’ for Twitter to do such a thing. And oopsie, it’s hardly unprecedented… unless, of course, they only count journalists they agree with.

Take a look at this nonsense:

From Axios:

Be smart: Regardless of how they were perceived, the suspensions on Thursday were unprecedented.

The big picture: Musk’s long-held frustration with the mainstream media has put him at odds with one of Twitter’s most active user groups.

Yeah, we don’t know why they write their articles in bullet points and lists but not everyone writes their articles with tweets and s**t-talking as we do so we suppose whatever floats their boat.

Too bad they’re wrong.

Remember that time Twitter locked out an ENTIRE outlet or two? New York Post… and The Babylon Bee. Heck, this editor has been locked and suspended multiple times, doesn’t that count? Or do they only care when a bunch of self-important Leftist-leaning journos get busted?

A Google search shows there are roughly 1000 employees at the New York Post … most of them are likely journalists SOOO we’re going to guess this Rupar getting suspended for being a troll isn’t all that ‘unprecedented.’

And that’s the other thing. These journalists were suspended for basically stalking Musk’s family. Before Musk, Twitter suppressed a story and locked an outlet to protect a politician … that seems like a bigger mistake to us.

Just sayin’.

***

Related:

Jim Treacher makes journos suspended for stalking Elon Musk’s toddler look even WORSE in perfect thread

Dan Rather’s swing and a TOTAL MISS at Elon Musk about free speech does NOT go well, at all

Taylor Lorenz scrubs her Twitter account after getting caught in SO many lies (and doxxes?) and LMAO

***

Editor’s Note:

Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!