Parker Molloy is so angry with LGBTQ Nation for publishing a piece from gay Conservative Chad Felix Greene that she started attacking the publication … only MOMENTS after she tweeted this:
Happy #WorldPressFreedomDay, all
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
Guess she was only wishing the press she agrees with a happy #WorldPressDay.
Hey, @lgbtqnation, so… your new contributor… pic.twitter.com/wT09uY5Uj9
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
Chad is standing up for Pete Buttigieg and Parker is still throwing a fit about it.
He is agreeing with her and yet she is smearing him because she disagrees with his politics.
Typical.
Guys… @lgbtqnation @bilerico… pic.twitter.com/m4MdxTisMb
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
Guys. *eye roll*
It's good to publish a diverse range of views, etc. … but when you're an LGBTQ publication, why would you pay someone to write a piece that 1.) breathes fresh air into a hoax, 2.) is very poorly written, and 3.) comes from someone who openly advocates against trans people?
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
Not into it, Bil pic.twitter.com/mzl8G7pxgJ
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
Who wants to explain to Parker what bigotry looks like?
Anyone?
He's not a new contributor. He wrote an op-ed defending @PeteButtigieg and calling out the Gays4Trump dude. We don't have to agree on everything or support anything else he's written to agree with him on this. Even a stopped clock…
— Bil Browning (@bilerico) May 3, 2019
Recommended
Poor Bil, he’s trying.
Pete Buttigieg doesn't need a defense for a Jacob Wohl conspiracy theory.
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
You know she’s a lot of fun at birthday parties.
tfw you go from subject to author at a site pic.twitter.com/Vzh9neHf0Y
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
Man, she is so ranty.
Heh.
To clarify, though: 1. CFG didn't get paid to write that (op-eds at that site are submitted for free), and 2. he's not a "contributor," as that's a term used for the site's paid reporters.
— Parker Molloy (@ParkerMolloy) May 3, 2019
Guess Chad just isn’t the right ‘type of gay’ in Parker’s sad opinion.
How dare Chad not be the right kind of gay. How dare people be afforded the option to read something and come to their own conclusion, think for themselves. pic.twitter.com/MWZG6tcUJO
— Lizzy Lou Who? (@_wintergirl93) May 3, 2019
What happens if a T is critical of one or more of LGBQs?
— Federalist Musket?? (@Patriot_Musket) May 3, 2019
What’s your point? @chadfelixg makes an excellent analysis.
— The Morning Spew (@TheMorningSpew) May 3, 2019
Seems her opinions aren’t exactly popular.
Chad himself fired back:
I'm not a contributor.
I have been outspoken in defense of @PeteButtigieg since this story broke and I recognized a need for us *all* to stand together against this terrible false accusation and growing conspiracy surrounding it.We *agree* here Parker. https://t.co/FlGHjUcz3z
— Chad Felix Greene (@chadfelixg) May 3, 2019
I was not paid.
I exposed a hoax and growing truther conspiracy surrounding it.
I am trans, I am open and critical about the current gender identity movement.Also, I am a fantastic writer.
Apologize. https://t.co/WLgD9CsXiM— Chad Felix Greene (@chadfelixg) May 3, 2019
Apologize.
Damn.
'Poorly written.'
Now that's just mean. pic.twitter.com/NqV07r6HoC
— Chad Felix Greene (@chadfelixg) May 3, 2019
His piece also triggered the ratio king himself, Zack Ford.
Why is @lgbtqnation publishing a toxic Federalist contributor like Chad Felix Greene who opposes LGBTQ protections and supports "dropping the T"? Doesn't seem worth elevating him.
— Zack Ford (@ZackFord) May 3, 2019
Same reason you always griped about Bilerico. There’s no purity test for an op-ed. Sometimes opinions are different; sometimes the same. This time you two have the same opinion. So maybe instead of complaining, you enjoy that. ??♂️
— Bil Browning (@bilerico) May 3, 2019
I don't care whether he agrees with me. I had to block him for being obsessed with me, accusing me of causing the next HIV/AIDS crisis, among other things.
I thought you'd be at least more discerning in who you publish than NYT Opinion, but I guess not.
— Zack Ford (@ZackFord) May 3, 2019
Cripes. EL OH EL.
It’s an article.
Zack and Parker likely agree with Chad’s opinions on Pete Buttigieg but they ‘hate’ him so much they are willing to try and hurt a publication for using an article he wrote.
You just have to wonder what the heck is wrong with people these days.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member