Dana Loesch gets under Shannon Watts’ skin and she doesn’t even have to try. Seriously.
Like when Dana tweeted about the insane guy who attacked Mitch McConnell and his wife in a restaurant:
This is ridiculous. These people are becoming more and more insane. https://t.co/EFe7TU7alB
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) October 20, 2018
Dana said nothing about the NRA, guns, the Second Amendment, and she certainly didn’t mention Shannon who we all know has her blocked (although to be fair, Shannon has most of Twitter blocked).
And somehow, our friendly neighborhood exploiter of tragedy saw Dana’s tweet and for whatever reason quote tweeted her with this.
Here’s Dana Loesch arriving in full makeup with a camera crew to heckle me while I was at a Moms Demand Action event with my kids in a park: https://t.co/f0zXb7NsvQ https://t.co/zaTgfOqUpl
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) October 22, 2018
Guess she unblocked Dana long enough to smear her …
Kristy Swanson wasn’t having any of it.
This is SO shady @shannonrwatts Why do you say your kids were there when there are no children in any of the videos? Why do you make comments on Dana being in “full makeup” when you know she hosts a TV show? This tweet just makes you look like an extremely jealous crazy maker☹️ https://t.co/BI0mibqhpi
— Kristy Swanson (@KristySwansonXO) October 22, 2018
SLAAAAAAY, slayer!
Kristy also realized most people who saw her tweet wouldn’t be able to see Shannon’s tweet because like we said, she has pretty much everyone who disagrees with her blocked.
Recommended
For the many of you who got blocked by her. Here it is.. pic.twitter.com/ETlDo45SQa
— Kristy Swanson (@KristySwansonXO) October 22, 2018
See?
"OMG, person with a TV show is covering my very public event."
So dramatic.— Ir-Russian-al Sense of Doom (@KarrieTheBaker) October 22, 2018
According to Chris Loesch, Shannon even sent Dana a press release which is basically an invitation to the event.
But sure, it was an AMBUSH!
Others (who weren’t blocked before but probably are blocked now) questioned Shannon on her claim:
Uh… lol, where were the kids? Seems like she was simply asking you a question that was too uncomfortable for you to answer. Wonder why.
— Jack Vale (@jackvale) October 22, 2018
We know, we know!
Right near me watching the whole debacle. Interesting that you’re focusing on where my kids were and not on Dana’s behavior. Especially as a “follower of Jesus” and such.
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) October 22, 2018
Even Jesus would roll his eyes at this tweet.
That actually wasn’t my focus. I was just confused about what you meant by “Dana’s behavior”. Wasn’t she just there asking questions (something reporters have a tendency to do)?
— Jack Vale (@jackvale) October 23, 2018
Yup.
Dana isn’t a reporter. She’s a shill. And if already turned down all of her requests to “debate.” She showed up to bully me.
— Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts) October 23, 2018
Says the shill.
Seriously, Shannon is so predictable.
Did Shannon have her armed Bloomberg security body checking Dana again?
— James Swick (@jamesbswick) October 23, 2018
We’re going to guess she did.
Wouldn't be the first time Watts completely fabricated something about Dana… probably won't be the last.
— Vets4AP (@Vets4AP) October 23, 2018
Truth.
Interesting: she dragged her kids to a political rally to use as props so she's upset that @DLoesch respected their privacy (as minors)?
— Tombstone Tim (@TimNorthVan) October 22, 2018
HA! Excellent point.
Why oh why would Shannon bring her children to an event when she knew Dana might be there?
One guess.
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member