Kirsten Gillibrand (who has received 1000's from Planned Parenthood) says funding them is not negotiable

Ya’ don’t say?

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: funding for Planned Parenthood is not negotiable. Too many lives would be negatively impacted.

— Kirsten Gillibrand (@SenGillibrand) June 27, 2017

Of course Senator Gillibrand wants Planned Parenthood to stay funded, they’ve given her a BUNCH of money over the years ($7000 alone in 2012).

Wonder if she is one of the lives that would be ‘negatively impacted’?

https://twitter.com/kennethv_123/status/879687493335085057

Shhh. Narrative and stuff.

Yeah except they had 734,000 to donate to Ossoff, I'm pretty sure they can survive without government funding, i.e. Selling baby parts.

— Nixon (@NIXONsounds) June 27, 2017

Oh yeah, that. Planned Parenthood could give Ossoff nearly a million dollars, but for some reason we should still feel guilty for wanting them defunded. Really?

Guess someone like Gillibrand who is also on the receiving end of Planned Parenthood dollars doesn’t quite get that.

Not really. Funding PP is a duplication of services tax wise since we have public clinics, and they do fundraisers. They don't need tax $.

— juli spice (@ImJuliCaldwell) June 27, 2017

Recommended

VA State Delegate Introduces Bill Banning the Government From Verifying Eligibility of Nonprofits

Brett T.

Advertisement

But they might not be able to keep sending her money.

Yep. About 120 million negatively affected since Roe.

— Vin (@VinceGottalotta) June 27, 2017

It’s pathetic that she doesn’t understand that funneling money to abortion mills negatively affects hundreds of thousands of little lives every year.

Related:

Wait … WAT?! Sister Helen Prejean exploits commandment to attack GOP health care bill

But EVIL GOP! Mary Katharine Ham schools Obamacare zealots with ONE realitweet