Rachel Maddow interviewed some former fancy-schmancy government type guy named David Laufman so she could continue to push the idea that Trump should have been charged with obstruction of justice because reasons …

Interesting how the same people who have spent two years telling us how it’s ‘Mueller Time’ suddenly don’t trust his findings or conclusions.

LOOK SEE! HE USED A BUNCH OF BIG WORDS AND SAID SOMETHING ABOUT A BALANCING TEST SO BOOM OBSTRUCTION! TOLD YOU!!!

We still don’t understand how Trump could have obstructed justice if there was no crime to obstruct in the first place but HEY, what do we know?

via GIPHY

Repeat after us, Rachel: No collusion.

Like we said, painful.

Oof.

Ahem, we were told there would be NO math.

Ahem. Orange man bad.

HA!

Give it time, Rachel.


Related:

NEVER go full Swalwell! Rep. Eric Swalwell’s explanation for why Dems will continue to investigate Trump is JUST a hot mess (watch)

So they’re NOT firefighters?! Jeff Zucker’s defense of CNN’s Trump/Russia coverage makes them look even WORSE and LOL

Take a SEAT! Ben Shapiro wipes the FLOOR with Jonathan Chait in back-and-forth about Trump and ‘obstruction of justice’