Don’t make Brit Hume angry.
You wouldn’t like him when he’s angry.
Ok, as long as you’re not a weepy progressive you probably would like him when he’s angry … we do.
Check this out:
By falsely claiming he attacked Hispanic immigrants. Doesn’t the Washington Post have editors? https://t.co/1UhGnFqavE
— Brit Hume (@brithume) June 23, 2018
Doesn’t WaPo have editors? HA HA HA HA HA.
From News Busters:
Over at the Pew Research Center there is this similar fact: “From 2009 to 2015, the number of unauthorized immigrants from Asia and Central America rose.”
All of this comes before you get to these other gems about presidential rhetoric from the Post story:
“….he has accused black football players who took a knee…”
He “… referred to some African nations as ‘shithole countries.’”
Now. One reads all this and has to ask the obvious (although never obvious to Leftists… unless it is) question: Who really is playing the race card here? Who is so obsessed with the color of someone’s skin color that they reconfigure a tweet that never mentions race into one that is all about race? Changing “illegal immigrants” to…but of course…the racial “Hispanic immigrants.”
Answer? The Washington Post.
And as for WaPo having editors, we’re going to guess no they do not. Or at least not editors who are unbiased when it comes to reporting the news.
That's the problem Brit; they do…
— Theodore (@RefDemo) June 23, 2018
Something like that.
Yes, and that's the problem.
— Michael Haz (@Michael_Haz) June 24, 2018
Yes. Good editors. Smart editors. Well paid editors. This is no mistake. It’s sanctioned.
— Winston T. Kray, Esq. (@JuzMeJD) June 23, 2018
We’re sensing a theme here about WaPo editors.
Such a thing as an 'editor' is apparently an outdated position. Numerous examples every day where a mildly-competent editor could have made the difference
— Donald Dennis (@DonaldDennis6) June 23, 2018
No, they have resisters!
— Chris (@LakeshowChris) June 23, 2018