The Left is working overtime to frame Kavanaugh as someone who is fringe right with no regard for diversity … and yeah, they’re failing.
We’ve said it once we’ll say it again, Kavanaugh was the least polarizing pick Trump could have made.
https://twitter.com/EdWhelanEPPC/status/1017075527662923781
Surprising? Really? This is the New York Times we’re talking about folks.
Absolutely no one will like this, but RBG’s track record of hiring black law clerks (& other staff) is not defensible by any honest person, especially anyone on the left (who would savage these numbers if they were true of Alito) https://t.co/5s3uUlPdvs
— Ian Samuel (@isamuel) July 12, 2018
Ruh-roh.
We’re all ears …
How about her record while on the Supreme Court. My presumption is that Ed is cherry picking numbers, because that’s what he does.
— Jonathan Singer (@jonathanhsinger) July 12, 2018
Yeah, we’re all cherry picking here, right?
As of late 2017, RBG had hired one—ever—black law clerk at SCOTUS. Ed’s not cherry-picking; he’s just got a juicy target here. That’s the unfortunate reality. https://t.co/PPp6hfOP2p
— Ian Samuel (@isamuel) July 12, 2018
Umm wow.
ONE.
In 25 years on the bench.
But tell us more about how racist Kavanaugh is.
“At the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
—Ruth Bader Ginsburghttps://t.co/4B3ik9FEVX
— Matthew Schmitz (@matthewschmitz) July 12, 2018
Whoa.
Paging Margaret Sanger. Eh Ruth?
Here’s another one of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s greatest hits: “It makes no sense as a national policy to promote birth only among poor people.”https://t.co/Hox0Jx0d3j
— Matthew Schmitz (@matthewschmitz) July 12, 2018
Alrighty then.
Wtf?!
— Stay At Home Sconnie (@Sjanderson86) July 12, 2018
A very Sanger-ian comment if ever there was one
— Rebecca M. (@BangtrebleknITr) July 12, 2018
Democrats sure can pick ’em.
Related:
‘Yikes! Paging Dr. FREUD’: Krassenstein brothers NUKED for absurd fanboying over Peter Strzok