Katie Pavlich was on Fox News this morning discussing the indictments:
.@KatiePavlich: "There is not a single sentence, not a single word in the indictment that refers to the campaign." https://t.co/L5xfeOfBCI pic.twitter.com/0TEwl73D11
— Fox News (@FoxNews) October 30, 2017
And she pointed out that there was not a single sentence or a single word that refers to the Trump campaign in the Manafort indictment. Seems this bothered Mark S. Zaid who was very publicly fired ON TWITTER earlier this year by his then client, Louise Mensch.
That's a wonderful defense. Did you know abt Papadopoulos facts? I doubt it. Shows #Mueller knows far more than ppl suspect.
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) October 30, 2017
Huh?
Plus Manafort/Gates indictment makes it clear criminal conspiracy continued WHILE he served as campaign manager. Ouch. Facts are facts.
— Mark S. Zaid (@MarkSZaidEsq) October 30, 2017
That doesn’t change anything about what Katie said or the actual indictments themselves.
Detailed Papasopoulos facts and ties to Trump campaign in the next sentence, clearly you aren't watching. https://t.co/AARgkWr5oM
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 30, 2017
Papadopoulos* facts are facts https://t.co/ZAcXQlAFiw
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 30, 2017
We love that she corrected herself.
The Papadopoulos plea deal after he lied to feds about contacts with Russia during campaign is *separate* from Manafort indictment
— Katie Pavlich (@KatiePavlich) October 30, 2017
Katie went on to explain her point once again; maybe she should have used puppets and crayons while dealing with Zaid.
Related:
‘Good news, bad news.’ Ben Shapiro sums up the Manafort indictment PERFECTLY in 3 tweets
REPORT: Special counsel’s indictment of Manafort and Gates contains these 12 charges
‘WOWOWOWOW’! Tony Podesta steps down after getting snared in Robert Mueller’s net