Okay WaPo writers, we know reading really isn’t your thing BUT you might want to make sure you’ve read something correctly BEFORE making a mistake this yuge.
Daniel W. Drezner, writer at the Washington Post, tweeted that Sessions described illegal aliens as filth …
Filth. He described illegal immigrants as "filth."
Whatever your views on immigration that's f**king embarrassing for a US official to say. https://t.co/sl5x5uLObK— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) April 11, 2017
Thanks to Alex Griswold from the Free Beacon for highlighting what Sessions actually said.
Oh hey, a Washington Post writer blatantly lying about what Jeff Sessions said. pic.twitter.com/QoGBWOBQNM
— Alex Griswold (@HashtagGriswold) April 11, 2017
Sessions called the criminal organizations (aka cartels and such) filth – which is absolutely TRUE. He did not call illegal immigrants filth but hey, when has the MSM owned up to their mistakes? Besides, the reaction Drezner will get from his followers is well worth it for him, right?
Hmm… maybe I over-interpreted Sessions' "filth" comment a little. I hope Twitter doesn't gang up on m– nope, I'm good. https://t.co/pjOCx7lJFe
— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) April 11, 2017
Recommended
Ya’ think? And hey, is over-interpreted another way to say LIED?
And sorry, Spicer making a fool of himself doesn’t have anything to do with blatantly lying about Sessions.
*sad trombone*
https://twitter.com/IChooseFakeNews/status/851856143211257856
Clearly this ‘writer’ has a bias where Sessions is concerned or he wouldn’t have read it this way.
Or then again he might’ve. Who knows with these people?
And…he's PAID to write???
— CRobinS (@In2HotH2O) April 11, 2017
All signs point to yes.
Crazy right?
Related:
‘EJECT! EJECT! EJECT!’ Sean Spicer’s Hitler comparison goes south — and only gets worse https://t.co/iWh7gqBG6d
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 11, 2017