Hillary lost because of Hillary. The end.
But go ahead, keep crying about Russia y’all, it gives Twitchy something to write about.
Like Peter here:
OK, even simpler for those who don't get it:
RUSSIA
INTRUDING
ON
OUR
DEMOCRACY
DOESN'T
MEAN
HILLARY
MADE
NO
MISTAKES.
BOTH
CAN
BE
TRUE. https://t.co/S4vnylU2pT— Peter Daou (@peterdaou) February 21, 2017
Well first and foremost we’re not a Democracy, and second, there is no proof that Russia had any impact on the election.
Own it. Hillary lost because she was just that awful.
*sad trombone*
How simple can we make this?
NOT
ONE
VISIT
TO
WISCONSIN
DURING
THE
GENERAL
CAMPAIGN. https://t.co/iU0NHZ5B9u— Conservative Review (@CR) February 21, 2017
Or how about:
HILLARY
LIED
AND
THEN
LIED
SOME
MORE
WHILE
WEARING
UGLY
PANTSUITS.
Quick word of advice to anyone who responds to Russian tampering with "Hillary didn't campaign in WI." Try harder. That talking point is old
— Peter Daou (@peterdaou) February 21, 2017
Gosh, Peter sounds fussy. And the age of the talking point is irrelevant, it’s true. Wisconsin cost her.
God Bless Wisconsin.
.@peterdaou Not as old as the talking points she tried to peddle on the trail.
— Conservative Review (@CR) February 21, 2017
Recommended
OUCH.
Heh.
So I take it Conservative Review is deflecting criticism of Russian tampering that our intel agencies confirmed by attacking Clinton?
— Peter Daou (@peterdaou) February 21, 2017
Waaaah.
.@peterdaou Not attacking Clinton, just stating facts.
— Conservative Review (@CR) February 21, 2017
Hey, it’s not Conservative Review’s fault if the facts don’t look good on Hillary.