The FBI director’s letter to Congress about extending and expanding the investigation involving Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner has dominated the news, and MSNBC’s Chris Hayes isn’t thrilled:
This is so nuts: we're now going to get daily blow by blow updates in the week before an election in investigation that may yield *nothing*
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) October 30, 2016
The federal government's most powerful investigative body has now succeeded in completely annihilating any presumption of innocence.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) October 30, 2016
Considering who the Dems chose to nominate, it was pretty much inevitable:
One way to have avoided this would be not to nominate someone under FBI investigation. https://t.co/5DflkJsK3K
— Jason (@jasonelevation) October 31, 2016
Why it's as if Democrats shouldn't have nominated Hillary. https://t.co/07ScohbZuU
— jon gabriel (@exjon) October 30, 2016
Yeah, nominating a criminal suspect was pretty dumb. https://t.co/ec01oIKfV4
— Phil Kerpen (@kerpen) October 30, 2016
Recommended
Wasn’t it!?
all of which could have been avoided if, you know, Hillary had actually released all her emails! https://t.co/V1ETy5ny0J
— Shoebox (@Shoeboxnre) October 31, 2016
https://twitter.com/BotchedLobotomy/status/793062304728379393
Couldn't she have turned this all over months ago? #YesIsTheCorrectAnswer https://t.co/v8jZcidF2Z
— Sen. Frank Niceley (@SenFrankNiceley) October 31, 2016
Then maybe next time you guys shouldn't nominate a candidate who's under federal investigation. https://t.co/fvEcXb0m4N pic.twitter.com/M4K5gxw4ZA
— ?It's?Almost ⛄️Christmas? (@jtLOL) October 31, 2016