As we reported earlier, Hillary Clinton didn’t wait very long before commenting on the officer-involved shooting Keith Lamont Scott in Charlotte, N.C.
Keith Lamont Scott. Terence Crutcher. Too many others. This has got to end. -H
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) September 21, 2016
Was Clinton’s comment made way too soon?
You don’t think it’s prudent to wait for the investigations to be concluded before politicizing this? https://t.co/TmdL9LxFi3
— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) September 21, 2016
There are, of course, certain times when Clinton thinks it’s inappropriate to comment right away, such as after a terrorist attack:
"I think it's always wiser to wait until you have information before making conclusions, because we are just in the beginning stages…" – H https://t.co/EAtt8vVjgQ
— Ben Taylor (@taylorben) September 21, 2016
Those words, delivered just a few days ago, only apply if it’s something that goes against the Dem narrative, apparently.
Hey media, remember when you were all "how dare a candidate speak before the investigation is done?" All the way back on Saturday? https://t.co/fM3FRjShYz
— Renna (@RennaW) September 21, 2016
Recommended
https://twitter.com/steph93065/status/778629745151844352
Good to see that for you, facts don't matter. Nice job.
— Chris Tsotsoros (@ctsotsoros) September 21, 2016
For @HillaryClinton, saying a bombing was from a bomb prematurely is bad.Implying Scott was killed without justification is a-ok
— Shane Styles (@shaner5000) September 21, 2016
https://twitter.com/ObiWanGOP/status/778670440902385664
Then again…
To be fair, Hillary has never been a fan of investigations and evidence. #Benghazi #EmailGate #Whitewater
— Shaun McDonnell (@McShauno) September 21, 2016
Fact check: True.