Well Huma, Donald approves.
Trump's stmt in reaction to Huma news has subject line:"DONALD J. TRUMP STATEMENT ON HILLARY CLINTON'S BAD JUDGMENT" pic.twitter.com/fzkpG3bmrN
— Frank Thorp V (@frankthorp) August 29, 2016
Interesting how he ties it to Hillary – and to be fair, it’s not a bad point.
"Huma is making a very wise decision” https://t.co/7synp92WKF
— Oliver Darcy (@oliverdarcy) August 29, 2016
Not unlike the majority of Americans who wondered how she could stay with Weiner after what he’s done time and time again.
https://twitter.com/BenjySarlin/status/770301730823299072
Is this politically dangerous? Or is this just looking out for a fellow human being? Interesting. Trump hasn’t had good things to say about Weiner, well, ever.
Trump: "I know Anthony Weiner well, and [Huma Abedin] will be far better off without him" https://t.co/eo8BdAPQaT pic.twitter.com/Feo07cTa0I
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) August 29, 2016
This is literally a year to the day that Trump first called Weiner "a perv" and "a sleazebag" on the campaign trail https://t.co/YwGn1YnZUu
— Ben Jacobs (@Bencjacobs) August 29, 2016
So is this purely political? Hard to say.
And honestly no matter what Trump does in this situation he won’t win with the press. If he says nothing, he doesn’t care, if he says something he’s playing politics.
Funny how some of the same people saying Trump should've stayed out Huma's personal business also would've asked him for a comment.
— Matthew Dempster (@dempstermd) August 29, 2016
Bingo.
In closing …
I think it goes without saying that Trump loves Pecker, but hates Weiner. @PolitiBunny @RantsOutloud
— ShieldMaidenMom (@sid67crowe) August 29, 2016
Ok ok ok, don’t get fussy … this was just too funny not to share.
Whether or not you’re a Trump supporter you gotta admit, this is pretty dang clever.