'Sad sick man'! Human Rights Watch head: Not all Hamas tunnels are 'rights violation'

Ladies and gentlemen, presenting Kenneth Roth:

Tunnels used to attack or capture civilians is a rights violation. Tunnels used to attack or capture soldiers isn't. http://t.co/gPPScdrYDO

— Kenneth Roth (@KenRoth) July 29, 2014

Dude, who is this guy?

Newsflash: Ken Roth is still an idiot. https://t.co/mNFTna9rin

— (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) July 30, 2014

Well, that much is clear. But he’s not just any idiot:

@RBPundit He's the head of Human Rights Watch.

— (((AG))) (@AGHamilton29) July 30, 2014

WHAT? RT @AG_Conservative @RBPundit He's the head of Human Rights Watch.

— RBe (@RBPundit) July 30, 2014

Considering that he’s the executive director of an organization claiming to be committed to defending human rights, he seems to have a rather slippery grasp on human rights. And on reality, really:

@KenRoth Are you serious? ANY tunnel that violates a country's security is a violation of a country's sovereignty. #StandWithIsrael

— CincoDeMayo ❌?✝️????? (@cinco_d_mayo) July 29, 2014

@KenRoth @JeffreyGoldberg so when they come up inside a Kibbutz what do you think they are planning to attack / capture? Goodness me

— Micamaleous (@ZuluMuster) July 30, 2014

@KenRoth @JeffreyGoldberg So that explains why they dig them under kibbutzim. Got it.

— Vic Rosenthal (@AbuYehuda) July 30, 2014

.@KenRoth that's your analysis? when these tunnels lead into kibbutzes where thousands of children live? really?

— Sigh-tama (@jewfulnoise) July 30, 2014

&#039;Sad sick man&#039;! Human Rights Watch head: Not all Hamas tunnels are &#039;rights violation&#039;

Recommended

'Sad sick man'! Human Rights Watch head: Not all Hamas tunnels are 'rights violation'