John Fugelsang: 'It is not possible to be liberal and a bigot'

Rather than buy a dictionary, we’ll just look up “liberal” and “bigot” online. “Believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change?” That and “a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc.” certainly don’t seem to be mutually exclusive. What do you say, Twitter?

True. Ask @michellemalkin if libs can be racist @gary4205 @shortwave8669 @TwitchyTeam @JohnFugelsang

— (((Aaron “Worthing” Walker))) (@AaronWorthing) April 5, 2014

.@AaronWorthing Bigotry is not liberal; just like supporting 2 wars off the books while cutting taxes is not conservative. @michellemalkin

— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) April 5, 2014

Funny there are a lot of ppl who falsely identify themselves as liberals, then. @JohnFugelsang @michellemalkin

— (((Aaron “Worthing” Walker))) (@AaronWorthing) April 5, 2014

No kidding.

Is this like the "true Marxism has never been tried" meme? @JohnFugelsang @michellemalkin

— (((Aaron “Worthing” Walker))) (@AaronWorthing) April 5, 2014

I mean how many times to self-described libs have to prove to be bigots before you recognize they are libs? @JohnFugelsang @michellemalkin

— (((Aaron “Worthing” Walker))) (@AaronWorthing) April 5, 2014

By your definition of "liberal" there apparently are no liberals… Except on the right @JohnFugelsang @michellemalkin

— (((Aaron “Worthing” Walker))) (@AaronWorthing) April 5, 2014

@AaronWorthing Again, go by the dictionary definition of 'liberal.' Though I sense you're not here for sincere debate. @michellemalkin

— John Fugelsang (@JohnFugelsang) April 5, 2014

John Fugelsang: 'It is not possible to be liberal and a bigot'

Recommended