Her comparison drew immediate reaction.
https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/414832102220525568
@kirstenpowers10 Bashir argued for something harmful to happen to a specific person; Robertson was expressing an opinion. Big difference.
— Tammy Bruce (@HeyTammyBruce) December 22, 2013
https://twitter.com/RobbieCooper/status/414830889663606784
@kirstenpowers10 Cuz Robertson just upheld tradional beliefs. He didn't say someone should shit in anothers mouth. Kinda different, no?
— Miller (@Miller89918204) December 22, 2013
@kirstenpowers10 they are two separate issues….context matters
— Eat my art (@danjdob) December 22, 2013
@kirstenpowers10 Bashir was on the air. Shitting in Palins mouth is not a long held religious belief. And we didn't call for his firing.
— Scott (@ScottyE_FL) December 22, 2013
https://twitter.com/avganka_jay/status/414855851677990913
@kirstenpowers10 @DennisPrager Can she not see the difference between the comments?
— EHerring (@HerringLiz) December 22, 2013
https://twitter.com/RickyBabaloo/status/414854727835197440
@kirstenpowers10 One difference between the cases is that professional standards of journalism don't apply to a redneck reality TV star.
— Jeremy Pierce (@TheParableMan) December 22, 2013
Recommended
“@kirstenpowers10: why do the ppl who wanted Bashir fired now say firing someone is attack on freedom” you really don't see a difference?
— Ericinspring (@Ericinspring) December 22, 2013
@kirstenpowers10 Do you really think it's fair to compare Bashir's gross unfounded remarks with Phil's coarse but Biblical based remarks?
— F. Ray Spencer (@rspencer_sr) December 22, 2013
Related:
Sick Martin Bashir takes Sarah Palin-bashing to obscene new extreme