Oregon is Antifa central, and the Federal Building in Eugene is one of its main targets. Here are scenes from January, when an Antifa protest turned into a riot:
Eugene, Oregon — ICE and federal agents rush Antifa agitators, deploy crowd control munitions outside the federal building to disperse unruly mob.
— Katie Daviscourt 📸 (@KatieDaviscourt) January 28, 2026
This comes after anti-ICE militants have been attacking the building for hours. pic.twitter.com/FdLeIHhiNi
NOW: The federal building in Eugene, Oregon, is being boarded-up following last night’s anti-ICE riot.
— Katie Daviscourt 📸 (@KatieDaviscourt) January 31, 2026
Antifa militants shattered windows, vandalized property, and assaulted federal agents. pic.twitter.com/3oVXA95cXg
The government put up fencing in April to protect against rioters and further damage to the building, but plaintiffs claimed that the presence of the fence tramples on their free speech rights.
JUST IN: A federal judge has ordered the embassy fencing to be removed outside the Federal Building in Eugene, Oregon.
— Katie Daviscourt 📸 (@KatieDaviscourt) June 23, 2026
The fencing was recently installed in response to ongoing violent riots carried out by Antifa and aligned anarchist groups since June 2025.
Rioters shattered… https://t.co/pRwsFpLcVz pic.twitter.com/lXLEP8dQTj
The post continues:
… windows and breached the facility earlier this year, prompting FBI manhunts.
Recommended
Nathan Wilk of KLCC reports:
Judge Mustafa Kasubhai said he was granting a preliminary injunction, siding with six local activists who are suing the federal government over the barrier.
The fence was installed in April, after Eugene Police declared a January protest at the site a riot. The barrier blocks the building’s upper courtyard and part of the sidewalk.
The plaintiffs argue that the fence’s presence tramples on their free speech rights, limiting the size of events that can be safely held outside the building.
It's like the Hamas playbook. Try and gaslight that terrorists are protesters or journalists.
— 🇺🇸 America's Great (@Gunalizer) June 23, 2026
Ignore that ass.
— Lane Violator Deetz (@tahDeetz) June 23, 2026
It’s time to start ignoring treasonous judges.
— WannabeAnglican (@WannabeAnglican) June 23, 2026
Another rioter-accomplice judge. How long do we put up with this?
— Richard Evans (@rich_evans13) June 23, 2026
How can a judge do this? Ignore him.
— Logen Kain (@techshotgun) June 23, 2026
To demand security removed from federal buildings sounds like treason/sedition to me.
Why would a judge get to decide how a federal building is protected? What law is being broken with a security fence?
— K J Gillenwater (@kjgillenwater) June 23, 2026
This is insanity. These judges tell ICE they can’t deploy crowd control measures. Local PD says they won’t assist. Now they’re saying no fence. These judges have an agenda.
— Travis B (@TCPDX79) June 23, 2026
Fuck the Judge. Get it overturned; not in his lane. Also arrest him for decreasing security so rioters can do more damage.
— MikeInTexas🇺🇸 (@Adopt_a_MEME) June 23, 2026
There's no way anyone had standing to file that lawsuit.
— Dr. Grumpy Peach, esq ✝️🇺🇸🇮🇱🐘 (@grumpypeach89) June 23, 2026
On what grounds?
— DesertAIP (@DesertAIP) June 23, 2026
Their First Amendment right to smash windows and breach the building has been trampled on by the fence.
There is absolutely no sound legal reasoning for this ruling. None. As long as there’s a point of entry - be it guarded locked or otherwise, it’s one-thousand percent not a 1A violation. What a clown.
— Tenn Bear 🐻 (@akaBarni) June 23, 2026
***