Democrats on the House Oversight Committee headed straight for the microphones and camera after emerging from a deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell, where she refused to answer questions. Of course, Rep. Jasmine Crockett was right there, making it all about President Donald Trump. They're playing games right now, she says, shielding and distracting from Trump, "who was absolutely mentioned in those files." Then she says, "the allegation was there" that he sexually molested a child, adding that "granted, the case didn't go through and whatever." But …the allegations were there, even before he was elected.
BREAKING: After walking out of the closed-door deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell, DEI extraordinaire Crockett can only reference debunked claims about Trump and his "involvement."
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) February 9, 2026
Why does she look high out of her mind? What concoction does her doctor have her on and how close is… pic.twitter.com/9061eexPEV
The post continues:
… it to what Hillary Clinton takes?
"Frankly, we know that he had already been sued prior to him ever entering office, where there were allegations that he sex*ally mol*sted a child. This is on the record. Now, granted, the case didn't go through and whatever, but.."
This is done intentionally to stir the pot and does NOTHING to bring justice to victims and survivors.
Democrats are doing EVERYTHING they can to "get Trump" no matter who it hurts in the process.
Truly depraved and delusional.
Once again, if there were anything implicating Trump in a crime in the Epstein files, the Joe Biden campaign would have released it during his administration. They've got nothing.
No eyelashes today. That's all I will contribute because I'm not unmuting 😆
— Mrsjmac520 (@mrsjmac0520) February 9, 2026
Recommended
Yeah, she hasn't been sporting the eyelashes recently. We wonder if there's a reason.
Okay so then by those rules someone could just say that there are "allegations that she sexually molested a child" too, right?
— ConstantF-ingDelight (@LipCurlGirl) February 9, 2026
Literally no other name matters to them
— Max (@maxwellian278) February 9, 2026
Arms flailing/gesticulating, excited delivery. It's all so tiresome...
— B Howard (@RealBradHoward) February 9, 2026
The woman is a lawyer. She knows what she’s doing. She’s skirting the edges of the truth just to get the clip circulating which will like stop just short of the caveat. @POTUS should come out swinging on this.
— Skylark (@skylark1984) February 9, 2026
She cannot be out of our Capitol soon enough.
— Alaskagirl (@Alaskacryptogi1) February 9, 2026
"...the case didn't go through and whatever, but..." 🙄
— N. R. Burnett, Sr. (@PastorNiral) February 9, 2026
Oh wow. She really side stepped that one
— BigBird (@iBuildNC) February 9, 2026
This morning's deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell resulted in no information about anything because Ghislaine invoked the 5th admendment..
— Thomas O'Connor '62 baby, #GodBlessAmerica 🇺🇲 (@TheyCallMeTomO1) February 9, 2026
Crockett, as usual, is full of it..
How would she like it if she got sued for something she didn't do and won in court?
— PhoenixPhyre™ (@PhoenixPhyre1) February 9, 2026
But it was only done to be used to later say, "It's on record that she was sued for these allegations."
Whatever they are on makes their eyes do that...and they're crazy. It's always in the eyes.
— The Bold Tiger (@the_boldtiger) February 9, 2026
What about all of the Democrats who've been mentioned in the Epstein files? Any accusations about them?
***