Unassigned

NY Times spotted making a slight modification to 'no evidence' of Biden corruption

The Biden White House spin about the president's involvement with his son Hunter's overseas business dealings has gone from "never discussed" anything to "wasn't in business with" to "yes they talked but only about the weather."

Advertisement

The media's also doing their best to help out. Here's one example: The New York Times has many, many stories where they reported that there's "no evidence" of any Biden wrongdoing:

Now it looks like the Times has modified "no evidence" to add a word:

And everybody knows what the Times means by "no hard evidence":

Until the check made out to Joe Biden with "for bribes" written in the memo section combined with video recordings of the exchange the media will stick to "no hard evidence." 

No hard evidence has emerged that Mr. Biden personally participated in or profited from the business deals or used his office to benefit his son’s partners while he was vice president. And Mr. Biden’s advisers have pointed to legal experts who argue that the tax and gun charges against the president’s son are rarely prosecuted. 

Still, Hunter Biden’s business dealings have raised concerns because testimony and reports have indicated that he traded on the family name to generate lucrative deals. Devon Archer, Hunter’s former business partner, told congressional investigators that Hunter used “the illusion of access to his father” to win over potential partners.

Advertisement

"No hard evidence," but a whole lotta soft evidence.

The Times story also plays up the "just a loving father" angle, of course.

That's a certainty.

*** 

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!