It seem like only yesterday when we were dragging the pride of Harvard, David Hogg. In fact, it was yesterday: He was asking if you need a license to kill deer, why don’t you need a license to kill humans? “Plenty of people will think this is dumb,” he followed up, and he was right, but he tweeted it anyway.
On Sunday, Hogg returned to well-trodden ground, declaring that uteruses should not be more heavily regulated by the government than guns.
Uteruses should not be more regulated than guns.
— David Hogg 🌻 (@davidhogg111) April 3, 2022
Yeah, we know, and it should also be harder to buy a gun than to vote. We’ve heard them all.
Since you probably have a vagina but not a uterus, let me explain – My uterus doesn't need a background check; I can bring my uterus anywhere in the world, without restrictions; My uterus is concealed without having to get permission from the government to do so
— Kimberly Morin (@Conservativeind) April 3, 2022
— Thumper🏴 (@mommiesmnstr) April 3, 2022
— woodsy (@serenitynow114) April 3, 2022
— Real Truth Cactus (@realtruthcactus) April 3, 2022
— Josh (@JoshWeber2) April 3, 2022
Which state has a uterus background check?
— The Left DOES NOT want a more perfect union! (@TurnCLTRed) April 3, 2022
Recommended
If you had experience with either you might have a different opinion.
— Darren G. (@DGraham28) April 3, 2022
You’re literally the last person that should be an authority on either.
— Mike Mason (@MikeMason830) April 3, 2022
Just for research, seeing as he’s co-founder of the March for Our Lives, Hogg should actually purchase a firearm. He can turn it in to the police right afterward if he wants, but he really needs to go through the process so he can stop sounding stupid.
Related:
David Hogg asks ‘if you need a license to kill a deer why don’t you need one to kill humans?’ https://t.co/pMWtYpYwvD
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 2, 2022