‘Proud Anchor Baby’ Congresswoman Introduces Legislation to Abolish ICE and 'Dismantle' DH...
Fernando Mendoza Is the Total Package — and Now He’s Teaching Gen Z...
Nancy Mace Is Speechless Over Sunny Hostin’s Brag About Being a Holdout Juror...
Ben Rhodes Trying to Imagine a Foreign Ambassador Calling for the Arrest of...
L Is for Lie, Ms. Rachel: Star Slammed for Passing a Biased Report...
AP: Guess the Race of Second Suspect Arrested in Hanging of Black Woman
Shockingly the Network Newscasts Are ALL OVER the ActBlue Foreign Funding Scandal (JUST...
RIP What’s Left of LA: Nithya Raman Takes the Lead Over Karen Bass
Javier Milei Just Destroyed the UN's 'Arrogant Parasites' Off the Top Rope (Right...
CNN’s Jake Tapper Not Going to Dignify Trump’s Juvenile Post About the Brilliant...
Dem. Senate Candidate Begs for Kamala Harris' Help (by Staying FAR Away From...
'Independent' Senate Candidate Dan Osborn Can Champion LGBTQ Issues and Immigration *After...
Video of Abdul El-Sayed Listening to Kamala Harris Gets the Musical Accompaniment It...
Hidden Camera Catches Talarico's Mom Planning Move to DC to Keep Him in...
CNN's Jake Tapper Wonders Why More Conservatives Aren't Defending Legacy Media Against Tru...

The Supreme Court strikes down Montana's limits on campaign finance, reaffirms Citizens United ruling

The Supreme Court ruled on American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock today. This case involved campaign finance laws and is sometimes nicknamed “Citizens United 2” by politicos and SCOTUS-watchers. The United States Supreme Court reversed the Montana Supreme Court’s decision.

Advertisement

The key part of the one page opinion (Justice Breyer wrote a dissent and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan):

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, this
Court struck down a similar federal law, holding that
“political speech does not lose First Amendment protection
simply because its source is a corporation.” 558 U. S. ___,
___ (2010) (slip op., at 26) (internal quotation marks omitted). The question presented in this case is whether the
holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state
law. There can be no serious doubt that it does. See U. S.
Const., Art. VI, cl. 2. Montana’s arguments in support of
the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case.
The petition for certiorari is granted. The judgment of
the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.
It is so ordered.

As Twitchy reported earlier, the Supreme Court also issued a decision on Arizona’s immigration law this morning, which kind of stole the thunder from this also important case.

This is a hugely important First Amendment ruling and it was met with great approval by those who value, you know, The Constitution and freedom of speech.

Advertisement

Fail,  Montana.

Senator McConnell (R-Ky.) also lauded the decision.

Who did not applaud the decision? The Left, of course. They don’t care for free speech and seek to quash it whenever they can. If you can’t beat them, silence them! That’s their motto.

Advertisement

And, zing!

https://twitter.com/jstrevino/status/217276554634465280

Truth. Of course, the Left tries to paint conservatives as hypocrites. Because, populist? Or anti-Wall Street? Or something. We aren’t quite sure; our cuckoo pants to sane decoder ring is in the shop. Twitter users give them a little taste of “truth to power” in response.

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217259004152393728

https://twitter.com/rorycooper/status/217259197748871168

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217258192684580864

Indeed. Kudos, Supreme Court!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos