CNN’s Abby Phillip Says No Distinction Between Citizens and Illegal Aliens Who Murder...
Overstepping the Marx: Hakeem Jeffries Lashes Out at Democrats Who Voted to Condemn...
TMZ Reports That AOC 'Is Officially Back on the Market' but Not for...
Documents Show 'Beloved' Kennedy Center Statue Targeted by Trump Administration for Remova...
Cory Booker’s Sob Story About a 5-Year-Old’s Father Being Detained by ICE Earns...
BOOM! Harmeet Dhillon Shares That Bowe Bergdahl’s Conviction for Desertion Stands
Abdul El-Sayed’s ‘Genocide’ Post From October 2023 Gets a Fresh Look
Two Ambassadors Tell Jim Acosta Trump Admin Reminds Them of Germany in the...
Here's the Group Backing That USPS Whistleblower Calling Out Trump's 'Chaotic' Mail-In Bal...
'Rev.' Talarico’s Federal Abortion Corps: Critics Call Out Fanatic After Post-Dobbs Letter...
Chuck Todd Thinks Susan Collins Sharing Factual Info About Her Dem Opponent Shows...
Woman Wants Us to Imagine the ‘Psychological Whiplash’ Tyler Robinson Must Be Going...
BRUTAL! Susan Collins Vowed Not to Mention Something About Troy Jackson (Guess What...
Try Not to Get Whiplash From MS NOW's Chris Hayes' Pivot on Musk...
American Heroes of 9/11: The Boatlift

The Supreme Court strikes down Montana's limits on campaign finance, reaffirms Citizens United ruling

The Supreme Court ruled on American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock today. This case involved campaign finance laws and is sometimes nicknamed “Citizens United 2” by politicos and SCOTUS-watchers. The United States Supreme Court reversed the Montana Supreme Court’s decision.

Advertisement

The key part of the one page opinion (Justice Breyer wrote a dissent and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan):

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, this
Court struck down a similar federal law, holding that
“political speech does not lose First Amendment protection
simply because its source is a corporation.” 558 U. S. ___,
___ (2010) (slip op., at 26) (internal quotation marks omitted). The question presented in this case is whether the
holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state
law. There can be no serious doubt that it does. See U. S.
Const., Art. VI, cl. 2. Montana’s arguments in support of
the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case.
The petition for certiorari is granted. The judgment of
the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.
It is so ordered.

As Twitchy reported earlier, the Supreme Court also issued a decision on Arizona’s immigration law this morning, which kind of stole the thunder from this also important case.

This is a hugely important First Amendment ruling and it was met with great approval by those who value, you know, The Constitution and freedom of speech.

Advertisement

Fail,  Montana.

Senator McConnell (R-Ky.) also lauded the decision.

Who did not applaud the decision? The Left, of course. They don’t care for free speech and seek to quash it whenever they can. If you can’t beat them, silence them! That’s their motto.

Advertisement

And, zing!

https://twitter.com/jstrevino/status/217276554634465280

Truth. Of course, the Left tries to paint conservatives as hypocrites. Because, populist? Or anti-Wall Street? Or something. We aren’t quite sure; our cuckoo pants to sane decoder ring is in the shop. Twitter users give them a little taste of “truth to power” in response.

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217259004152393728

https://twitter.com/rorycooper/status/217259197748871168

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217258192684580864

Indeed. Kudos, Supreme Court!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement