Popular Smote: Scott Jennings Zings Bakari Sellers With Truth About Hillary Clinton’s 2016...
Meritless Merrick: Mar-a-Lago Raid Revelations Show Garland Was Not Applying Law Evenly As...
Dem Chuck Schumer Says Obliterating Narco-Terrorists Who Poison Americans Really Turns His...
Sen. Mark Kelly Posts Yet ANOTHER Video to Let Us Know He Won’t...
Cory Booker Says ‘ICE Was Here’ Nativity Sends Message That We’re All God’s...
Minneapolis Police Chief Says That Mary and Joseph Themselves Were Considered Outsiders
House Dems Introduce Resolution to Force Military to Stand Down Against Designated Terrori...
After Shooting at Hanukkah Event, Bernie Sanders Frets Over Islamophobia
Men Harass Officers Assigned to Track Down Child Predators, Mistaking Them for ICE
Tim Kaine: Robert E. Lee Statue in Capitol Replaced With Barbara Rose Johns
Asheville Vice Mayor Under Investigation for Voting in Both NC and Georgia Three...
Prodigal Elon Musk Returns to Trump White House Family in Time to Help...
War on Media! CNN’s Brian Stelter Fumes Trump Will Hold BBC Accountable for...
Tim Burchett Says Rubio and Hegseth Proved Democrats Went Overboard on Legal Narco-Terrori...
'Target Karen' Tries to Harass Worker Over Charlie Kirk Shirt; the Response Is...

The Supreme Court strikes down Montana's limits on campaign finance, reaffirms Citizens United ruling

The Supreme Court ruled on American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock today. This case involved campaign finance laws and is sometimes nicknamed “Citizens United 2” by politicos and SCOTUS-watchers. The United States Supreme Court reversed the Montana Supreme Court’s decision.

Advertisement

The key part of the one page opinion (Justice Breyer wrote a dissent and was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan):

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, this
Court struck down a similar federal law, holding that
“political speech does not lose First Amendment protection
simply because its source is a corporation.” 558 U. S. ___,
___ (2010) (slip op., at 26) (internal quotation marks omitted). The question presented in this case is whether the
holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state
law. There can be no serious doubt that it does. See U. S.
Const., Art. VI, cl. 2. Montana’s arguments in support of
the judgment below either were already rejected in Citizens United, or fail to meaningfully distinguish that case.
The petition for certiorari is granted. The judgment of
the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.
It is so ordered.

As Twitchy reported earlier, the Supreme Court also issued a decision on Arizona’s immigration law this morning, which kind of stole the thunder from this also important case.

This is a hugely important First Amendment ruling and it was met with great approval by those who value, you know, The Constitution and freedom of speech.

Advertisement

Fail,  Montana.

Senator McConnell (R-Ky.) also lauded the decision.

Who did not applaud the decision? The Left, of course. They don’t care for free speech and seek to quash it whenever they can. If you can’t beat them, silence them! That’s their motto.

Advertisement

And, zing!

https://twitter.com/jstrevino/status/217276554634465280

Truth. Of course, the Left tries to paint conservatives as hypocrites. Because, populist? Or anti-Wall Street? Or something. We aren’t quite sure; our cuckoo pants to sane decoder ring is in the shop. Twitter users give them a little taste of “truth to power” in response.

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217259004152393728

https://twitter.com/rorycooper/status/217259197748871168

https://twitter.com/LachlanMarkay/status/217258192684580864

Indeed. Kudos, Supreme Court!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos