Twitchy Favorites Weigh in on the U.S. Taking in Palestinian Refugees
Wading Into the Debate Over the Importance of Stay at Home Mothers
'Stunningly Unwise': Pastor Deserves ALL the Heat for Saying PTSD Isn't Real
The Onion Hilariously Weighs in on the Campus Encampments
VIOLATING THE LAW: UCLA Protesters Use Wristbands to ID 'Anti-Israel' Students, Give Them...
KJP Reminds Journo Asking About Biden's Current Silence That He Spoke Out About...
Chris Hayes, Rolling Stone Writer Say These Student Protests Are Pretty Standard
Tissue? Columbia Prof Says Faculty Didn’t Approve of Police on Campus
Joe Biden Tweeted a Mental Health Awareness Post and It Went Horribly Wrong
Columbia Clean-Up Crew, Can Frat Bros Save America?
KJP Not Concerned With Bird Flu Epidemic Affecting Cattle Because She Doesn't Eat...
Mock-Tastic! Bill Melugin Shares 'List of Needs Protesters at the UCLA Camp are...
Bill Kristol WRECKED for 'Morning Thoughts' Post on Possible Trump Win
USA Today 'Reporter' Peculiarly Seeking to Dox Jewish UCLA Students Rather Than Their...
KJP Dodges Qs About Protests As Biden's 2020 'Leadership' Jab at Trump Continues...

NYT headline writer needs a biology lesson on how an umbilical cord works

The Washington Post’s Karen Tumulty called out the New York Times over this dopey headline on an article suggesting Bernie Sanders won’t be able to get Medicare for All passed even with a Dem-controlled Senate.

Advertisement

The NYT headline: “Even a Democratic Senate Wouldn’t Likely Cut the Cord on Sanders’s Baby.” Um, do they even know how umbilical cords work?

Their metaphor makes zero sense:

This metaphor wouldn’t be any better:

Anyway, now the headline reads, “Even if Sanders Wins, Medicare for All Almost Certainly Won’t Happen”:

Which has been true since Day 1 of the campaign so why are they just pointing this out now?

***

 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement