I've Seen a Lot of Dirty Democrats Over the Years, but VA Sen....
COUP?! DataRepublican Drops Receipts in BOMBSHELL Thread About Why Pete Hegseth Is REALLY...
POS Chris Murphy BODIED for Cheering Iran AGAINST America (Not to Mention His...
BBC Educates Viewers on That Arabic Yodeling That Islamophobic Sabrina Carpenter Said Was...
Veterans Occupy US Capitol to Protest War in Iran, Genocide in Gaza
USA Today Does Puff Piece on ‘Poetic’ Mission of Fired Amnesty-Happy Immigration Judge
Venezuelan Family Who 'Followed the Rules' Leaving the US After Being Detained
BBC Investigates Insider Trading Suspicions 'Looming' Over Trump's Presidency
'Anti-Billionaire Progressive Group' Shatters Irony Detectors After Endorsement in Calif....
Repeat This When Republicans Frustrate You: In a Two-Party System, Opting Out Is...
Dancing MI Senate Candidate Enters Dem Convention With Drumline and Giant Head
MI Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Torches His Campaign with Attacks on Usha Vance...
Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud: Ex-Obama US Attorney Mocks Kash Patel’s Odds...
Report: Minnesota High School Renovation Includes Prayer Rooms, Foot-Washing Stations
Leftists Cry Over Florida Ending Taxpayer-Funded Junk Food for SNAP Recipients

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement