CNN Seems Upset All This Lefty Screeching Hasn't Halted Final Approval for Trump's...
Pod Save Bro Jon Favreau: Ignore the Nazi Tattoo—Platner Wore a Cool Anti-Fascist...
Hasselbeck Is the Upgrade 'The View' Didn't Expect—Drops Truth Bombs on Borders and...
Fetterman Owns Mehdi Hasan's Reporter: 'I Know He's All Broke Up About the...
Slammer Yammer: Video Surfaces of Talarico Calling for Prisons to Be Replaced With...
Tom Morello Reposts Journo Giving Three Year Letterman an Education
Law Prof Calls Karoline Leavitt 'Spitting Out President Obama's Middle Name' Despicable
We Learn More About Wife of Service Member Who Trashed Operation Epic Fury...
Legendary College Football Coach Lou Holtz has Died
Source: Trump Insisted on Name Operation Epic Fury to Keep Google From Autosuggesting...
Texas Picks Radical James Talarico: God Is Non-Binary, Men Get Pregnant, Jesus Loves...
Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s Replacement in Congress Could Be Even Worse Than She Was
Lights, Camera, HILLARY! Clinton Team Demanded ‘Beauty Lighting’ and Backdrop for Epstein...
Congresswoman Threatens Kristi Noem That She Will Be Held Accountable Once Trump Is...
Too Many Jasmine Crocketts! Will the Real Dem Lady Please Stand Up, Please...

Jeffrey Goldberg gives a Memorial Day push to The Atlantic's incredibly dubious hit piece on Trump from last year

Last year, The Atlantic published a story alleging that then President Trump referred to soldiers fallen in times of war “losers” and “suckers.” The Atlantic’s story also claimed that, while visiting John Kelly’s son’s grave at Arlington National Cemetery in 2017, Trump asked Kelly “what was in it for them?”

Advertisement

The story, which is based on the “anonymous sources” that were so prevalent during Trump’s tenure, immediately became riddled with holes. Jeffrey Goldberg, editor in chief of The Atlantic, then claimed the sources would remain anonymous, basically because he didn’t want to subject people to mean tweets from Trump.

Well, this Memorial Day, Goldberg is re-upping the uber-dubious story:

Considering how many of the media’s “sources” were discredited these past few years (along with the media debunking things Trump said that turned out to be factual or possibly true), the story remains to be taken with less than a grain of salt:

Well, they probably got a few more Resistance clicks, and it wouldn’t be surprising if CNN and/or MSNBC give the story fresh life today.

Advertisement

Sounds totally legit! *Eye roll*

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement