Will 'Journos' Ever Learn?: X is the Mainstream, Not The Atlantic and Other...
Conservatives Not Pleased With Trump's Labor Secretary Nominee
Mayor of Denver Seems to Walk Back Threat to Use Police to Prevent...
Chief Diversity Officer at the NIH Retiring at the End of the Year...
Mark Cuban Goes Full BlueAnon Accusing Elon Musk of Having Bot Army
Trump's Surgeon General Nominee Praised Facebook for Its Censorship During COVID
Biden Says He Left the Country Better Off Than 4 Years Ago (Which...
WH's 'Building a Better Future' Post With Pic of Kamala Harris Waving Goodbye...
U.N. Secretary-General Seems a Bit Concerned His 'Climate Finance' Is Drying Up
J.K. Rowling Continues to Be Enemy Number One to the Left With Her...
WHAT THE EUGENICS? Academic Writes That We Should Find Someone Better to Bear...
'Full of S**t'! Megyn Kelly Reenacting Phoniness From MSNBC's Joe & Mika Is...
Darrell Issa Asks Why State Dept. Is 'Catering to Federal Employees Personally Devastated'...
'Part of the Problem': Bill Maher DROPS Neil deGrasse Tyson Over Men in...
Report: Yes, Trump 'Plans to Fire the Entire Team' VERY Soon (Brace for...

Sorry, Chuck & Nancy: SCOTUS delivers buzzkill to congressional Dems hoping to obtain Trump's financial records

Earlier we told you that Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch were among seven Supreme Court justices who ruled that the Manhattan District Attorney can subpoena President Trump’s tax records.

Advertisement

That ruling came ahead of a decision on whether Congress can see Trump’s financial records, and it must have had congressional Democrats giddy with anticipation. Instead, the Court delivered a buzzkill to the Dems, at least for the time being:

Advertisement

Thomas and Alito dissented for this reason:

Time will tell as to what happens when this issue goes back to the lower courts, but for now congressional Dems can’t be thrilled.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement