As we told you yesterday, the White House announced that U.S. funding for the World Health Organization has been suspended pending a review of the organization’s performance (or lack thereof):
Brace for meltdown: Donald Trump announces halt on WHO funding pending probe of their 'role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus' https://t.co/8Ol96jG6Pe
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) April 14, 2020
Defending WHO, Senate Democrat Pat Leahy unleashed an analogy that many took issue with:
Here is how Senator Leahy responds: “Withholding funds for WHO in the midst of the worst pandemic in a century makes as much sense as cutting off ammunition to an ally as the enemy closes in.” https://t.co/kZYMd4NUTQ
— Michele Kelemen (@michelekelemen) April 14, 2020
To run with that comparison requires making some serious assumptions…
does Leahy know what the word “ally” means? does he know what "enemy" means for that matter? https://t.co/P8qTw8ai6R
— ???? ???? ?? ??. ?????-?? (@BecketAdams) April 15, 2020
We’re not sure he does.
Unless the ally was feeding disinformation from an adversary that slowed your response because you trusted them https://t.co/dLq2lDTZin
— Tim Pool (@Timcast) April 14, 2020
This makes total sense if you just came out of a 20 year coma.
— Chinese Quality Control Monkey (@ARaised_Eyebrow) April 15, 2020
What if the “ally” was a traitor?
— Sam Spade Jr. (@MattLawmlb) April 14, 2020
They were and are aiding the enemy that unleashed a deadly virus on the world.
— I'm sorry… What? (@RussellWayneEv1) April 14, 2020
And by “ally”,
he means “enemy”, of course.— Flyover Bumpkin (@jswilt) April 15, 2020
Glad Leahy is signaling his support of CCP so early!
— Pouncing Coder Brad (@bradcundiff) April 15, 2020
This comparison only works if your ally is Charles Manson.
— Ken Webster jr??? (@KenWebsterII) April 15, 2020
@realDonaldTrump was hired to fire organizations like WHO. Hopefully the UN is next on his list. pic.twitter.com/dtEbA3cdOo
— Chris Hofstetter (@ChrisHofstette6) April 14, 2020
