White House press shop running interference for Hillary –> https://t.co/JfliZv6spu
— Christian Vanderbrouk (@UrbanAchievr) March 11, 2015
@Schultz44 @jonkarl You should probably look into this more before tying a game of 'gotcha'…
— Shane Styles (@shaner5000) March 11, 2015
White House Deputy Press Secretary Eric Schultz attempted to help Hillary Clinton out of her bind by passing along this ABC News story:
Rep. Jason Chaffetz's Business Card Lists His Gmail Address http://t.co/Uawaw3RWEZ via @jonkarl pic.twitter.com/LBQyvEfoFx
— E. Schultz -Archived (@Schultz44) March 11, 2015
It that a big deal? No: “Chaffetz told ABC News that his business card was not paid for with government funds and that Congress is not subject to the Federal Records Act.”
https://twitter.com/confedofadunce/status/575710854013825024
.@confedofadunce Congress is also prohibited from using government resources for political purposes. @Schultz44
— RBe (@RBPundit) March 11, 2015
https://twitter.com/Roger247/status/575712049465970688
https://twitter.com/Wrichards2/status/575713319820005376
https://twitter.com/DukeRulesUSA/status/575709514839646208
In spite of the fact that a Federal worker’s email regs aren’t nearly the same as those for members of Congress, the White House press office seems to hope the bogus comparison helps vindicate Hillary. It doesn’t:
Quick question, @Schultz44: What would Chaffetz use this business card for? Hint: Political events. You're welcome. @jonkarl
— RBe (@RBPundit) March 11, 2015
.@Schultz44 @jonkarl did Hillary's email as Senator end in @clintonemail.com? Oops there goes the 2 device/personal email theory
— TheRightWingM ?? (@TheRightWingM) March 11, 2015
https://twitter.com/TheRealBepo/status/575709978612334593
https://twitter.com/DukeRulesUSA/status/575709871594561536
https://twitter.com/NordenJim/status/575711683454373889
@Schultz44 Do you have a point here, princess?
— DocHolliday (@DocHolliday2823) March 11, 2015
https://twitter.com/Roger247/status/575711206360510467
@Schultz44 @jonkarl Lol … You have no point right? Just being specious?
— Dan Vandefifer (@vandefifer) March 11, 2015
@Schultz44 @jonkarl but he gets it out there to the uninformed and they believe it. That's the point, it's not about accuracy
— kitty (@mkbl) March 11, 2015
@Schultz44 @jonkarl Even deleted Gmail emails would be subject to subpoena. But deleted emails from a private server are simply *gone*
— BAH! Humbuggery… (@thehiredmind) March 11, 2015
@Schultz44 This has already been brought up and vetted. Try focusing on the one who would be president. #TryAgain
— Dr. Ramirez ?? ??? (@cybr_gk) March 11, 2015
@Schultz44 @jonkarl Which law does that violate again? None?
— Kyle Sammin (@KyleSammin) March 11, 2015
https://twitter.com/ScottInSC/status/575711588675686400
@Schultz44 You're not very good at this, are you?
— Thankful Muppet Energy (Sunny) (@sunnyright) March 11, 2015
https://twitter.com/MinnesotaRonin/status/575710801035673601
https://twitter.com/MassivRuss/status/575710841053560832
***
Related:
‘No such thing as an ‘ex-hack”: Toolbag ex-NSC spox Tommy Vietor deflects for Hillary
Join the conversation as a VIP Member