WH Media Defense of Their 'Reporting' Is Laughable (Look at All This Anti-Trump...
JD Vance Breaks Out the Puppets and Crayons Explaining Trump's 'Ban' to Fussy...
This One's for YOU! Lauren Boebert Gives Media the Proverbial Middle Finger in...
CNN, MS NOW and POLITICO Join Forces to Sue Trump and Their Statement...
He's Dead, Jim. DEAD! Brandon Gill Ends Hasan Piker in BRUTAL Clash When...
CNN Legal Analyst Explains When Mortgage Fraud Is and Isn't a Victimless Crime...
Death Panels Were Never a Conspiracy: Canada’s 'Care' Offered Suicide, America Offered a...
'DoorDash Hires Illegals?' X DOG-WALKS Woman Claiming She's Representing Illegal ICE Shot...
James Woods Flashes Back to the Moment CNN Lost Its Last Shred of...
1619 Writer Nikole Hannah-Jones Just Learned the Hard Way That WOKE SUCKS and...
Wrong Talking Points, Spartacus: Sen. Cory Booker Calls Abdul El-Sayed a 'Fringe' Figure
Monday Morning Meme Madness
DEVELOPING: Here We Go Again: Another ICE-Involved Shooting, This Time in Austin (VIDEO)
Bloodsucker Proxy: Communist Asks for a DSA Mascot, Gets a Whole Lot More
Ron DeSantis Shares Headline That Sums Up Healthcare in 2026

Film critic Richard Roeper: Most Phil Robertson supporters don't understand definition of 'intolerance'; Updated

Film critic Richard Roeper recently tweeted about “Duck Dynasty,” referring to the show as “poorly contrived crapola.” Today, Roeper expressed his low tolerance for the opinion of Phil Robertson while taking it upon himself to educate Robertson’s supporters on the definition of “intolerance”:

Advertisement

Fortunately for the hayseed peasantry, Roeper is here to educate:

And with that, Roeper called an end to his foray into the Phil Robertson/”Duck Dynasty” controversy because he’s up to here with all the intolerance, or something.

Update:

Roeper later wanted to make this clarification, which is a fair point:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement