USA Today Does Puff Piece on ‘Poetic’ Mission of Fired Amnesty-Happy Immigration Judge
Venezuelan Family Who 'Followed the Rules' Leaving the US After Being Detained
BBC Investigates Insider Trading Suspicions 'Looming' Over Trump's Presidency
'Anti-Billionaire Progressive Group' Shatters Irony Detectors After Endorsement in Calif....
Repeat This When Republicans Frustrate You: In a Two-Party System, Opting Out Is...
Dancing MI Senate Candidate Enters Dem Convention With Drumline and Giant Head
MI Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Torches His Campaign with Attacks on Usha Vance...
Saying the Quiet Part Out Loud: Ex-Obama US Attorney Mocks Kash Patel’s Odds...
Report: Minnesota High School Renovation Includes Prayer Rooms, Foot-Washing Stations
Leftists Cry Over Florida Ending Taxpayer-Funded Junk Food for SNAP Recipients
Ted Lieu Makes Up a Law to Accuse President Trump of Threatening War...
Tomi Lahren Gets Andy Beshear’s Panties in a Bunch by Warning He’s a...
Podcast: Retired CIA Analyst Says Trump Tried to 'Use the Nuclear Codes' on...
The Most American Idea Nobody Talks About
Gulag Dialogue: Pete Buttigieg Leans Into Fear That MAGA Will Put LGBTQ+ People...

AP: Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks Order Defunding NPR and PBS, Citing First Amendment

AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File

And here we were, happy knowing that our tax dollars weren't going to support the propagandists at NPR and PBS. But once again, it seems as if that last presidential election we had was just for show, because judges seem to be running the country. We haven't seen anything in the Constitution that guarantees state-funded media, so we're curious exactly on what grounds this judge has made this ruling. The First Amendment? Get out of here.

Advertisement

So a judge is ordering taxpayers to fund progressive radio and TV? Michael Kunzelman reports for the AP:

Citing the First Amendment, a federal judge on Tuesday agreed to permanently block the Trump administration from implementing a presidential directive to end federal funding for National Public Radio and the Public Broadcasting Service, two media entities that the White House has said are counterproductive to American priorities.

The operational impact of U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss’ decision was not immediately clear — both because it will likely be appealed and because too much damage to the public-broadcasting system has already been done, both by the president and Congress.

Moss ruled that President Donald Trump’s executive order to cease funding for NPR and PBS is unlawful and unenforceable. The judge said the First Amendment right to free speech “does not tolerate viewpoint discrimination and retaliation of this type.”

“It is difficult to conceive of clearer evidence that a government action is targeted at viewpoints that the President does not like and seeks to squelch,” wrote Moss, who was nominated to the bench by President Barack Obama, a Democrat.

Advertisement

Is this guy serious? NPR and PBS have a First Amendment right to free speech, but no right to be subsidized by taxpayer dollars.

We were assured by both PBS and NPR that taxpayer funding was just a tiny sliver of their operating budgets, and they would carry on. Which they have been.

No way this holds up on appeal.

Advertisement

The First Amendment, duh.

It is meaningless. This judge must be a real progressive activist to embarrass himself like this. We've read the First Amendment. PBS and NPR aren't in there.

***

Editor's Note: Unelected federal judges are hijacking President Trump's agenda and insulting the will of the people.

Help us expose out-of-control judges dead set on halting President Trump's mandate for change. Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement