Laurence Tribe takes a look at the frightening adoption-centered future that awaits in a world without Roe

Even before the Dobbs ruling came down, crisis pregnancy centers and churches were being targeted by vandals and arsonists, some going by the name “Jane’s Revenge.” “If abortion isn’t safe, you’re not safe,” they’d spraypaint on these centers.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren joined in in spirit, tweeting that “it’s more important than ever to crack down on so-called ‘crisis pregnancy centers’ that mislead and deceive patients seeking abortion care” and suggesting she had a bill that would shut them down.

And now there’s adoption that needs demonizing. Mother Jones is on the case with a piece about the cruel abortion industry, and it was passed along by law professor Laurence Tribe:

A frightening but realistic look at the cruel adoption-centered future that awaits far too many of our daughters and sisters, mothers and granddaughters in a world without Roehttps://t.co/Wzc8pnKXyj

— Laurence Tribe (@tribelaw) July 5, 2022

Only liberals would find adoption cruel, but ripping a baby from its mother’s is not.

Good God. https://t.co/KyqgqBzesQ

— Kathleen McKinley (@KatMcKinley) July 5, 2022

Ok, so let’s just kill the babies instead. What a stupid notion. https://t.co/qxGxZFELP9

— Dianna Tauer (@DiannaTauer) July 5, 2022

Adoption is cruel? But pulling a baby by its head from the womb and tossing it the garbage is just reproductive rights. https://t.co/4VYhpgauw7

— J L Fairchild🇺🇸🇮🇱 (@J_L_Fairchild) July 5, 2022

Note the ghastly presupposition: It’s better to have never lived than to be born into the projected adoptionpocalypse.

Progressives hate the thought of being unable to play god and find murder the morally superior option to adoption. They also assume a largely fatherless world. https://t.co/W3VgyB7ffk

— 𝕸𝖎𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖊𝖑 𝕮𝖆𝖗𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖔 (@MichaelCarlino) July 5, 2022

This is so strange. Gut-wrenching stories of mothers not allowed to see their babies who are put up for adoption inherently means the mothers value the life of their newborns and this is used to justify aborting those longed-for babies? https://t.co/JYbpYvgAJw

— Karl Dierenbach (@Dierenbach) July 5, 2022

"cruel adoption-centered future," said the Very Serious Harvard professor with no sense of irony. https://t.co/SXvF0oU6a5

— Andrew T. Walker (@andrewtwalk) July 5, 2022

To be clear, what he means is it’s less cruel to kill them than allow them to be born and adopted. https://t.co/V5COqpGLJv

— Matt Cable (@cablematt) July 5, 2022

Let’s just go to the orphanages and slaughter the orphans, then. https://t.co/TjQbquGplO

— Darryl Archideld 🗣💯 (@DGBFan) July 5, 2022

Let’s face it … it’s just a lot more convenient to kill the baby and pretend like it was never conceived.

Related:

Patricia Heaton takes on HORDE of frothy-mouthed pro-aborts after DROPPING Elizabeth Warren for attacking crisis pregnancy centers and BOOMhttps://t.co/fH5oTpZGCx

— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) June 30, 2022