The Daily Mail knew it had clickbait on its hands for sure with the teaser, “Is YOUR baby racist?” Of course not. Well, I certainly don’t think so, but … click.
Is YOUR baby racist? https://t.co/5eoxRp8HHA
— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) April 12, 2017
Really?
— Zarathustra (@zazelpop) April 12, 2017
https://twitter.com/davetalkssports/status/852335398248472576
What liberal wrote this?
— Scott ????????? (@CheesepuffScott) April 13, 2017
Jumping the shark
— Build The Wall? (@DublinMimi) April 13, 2017
https://twitter.com/HmmEmma/status/852306838208958464
Likes to be wrapped in white sheets all the time. And drinks WHITE milk. I think so.
— HulkyHogan (@urpoorfeelings) April 13, 2017
Don't know. Don't care. He is 1…
— IronSuit (@trevorf84) April 13, 2017
We confess: we clicked, and there’s not a lot there. The two studies presented are less about racism than race-based bias, and even that comes down to babies between 3 and 8 months seeming to prefer faces that resemble those they see most often. The refreshing bit, of course, is that studying babies avoids those tedious collegiate discussions of systems of oppression and intersectionality and white privilege and so on.
But only white babies right… cuz minorities can't be that… or something
— ??CKukster88?️? (@Kukster88) April 13, 2017
Leftists are very sick people. Now they have invented a reason to start indoctrinating babies with their vial brand of identity politics.
— Bapo Rothstein (@BapoRothstein) April 12, 2017
The researchers suggest exposing babies to people from a variety of races as early as possible to prevent racial bias. We’ll humbly suggest that everyone just keep doing what they’re doing.
* * *
Related:
New study finds solution to counter affect of 'hypermasculine media' on young boys https://t.co/4jjeVX0NnJ
— Twitchy Team (@TwitchyTeam) June 24, 2016
Join the conversation as a VIP Member