Vindman Drops 16M and Still Gets Clowned by a Commie in Florida —...
Redsteeze Unleashes Grok to Permanently Brand Congress With the Tattoos They Deserve (It’s...
Chip Roy Sums Up CNN-Style 'Journalism' After Natalie Harp Sensationalism Backfires
The Memo (or Fatwa) Went Out: Michigan Dems Bend the Knee in Unison...
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott Has a Demand of His Own After MN AG...
Oh, Brother!: CNN’s Erin Burnett Questions Sibling of Natalie Harp to Prolong Scandal...
Don Lemon and Jemele Hill Say Stephen A. Smith Is ‘Problematic’ for Hosting...
Briahna Joy Gray and the Luigi Mangione Murder Apologists
Trump Gloats As Alexander Vindman Suffers Upset Loss to DSA Member in FL...
That's Not Funny: Amnesty International UK to Host 'Comedy' Event
AG Keith Ellison Sues Texas to Compel the Extradition of an ICE Agent...
Broadcaster Says Racism in the Media Is Responsible for ‘Proffesor’ Jason Arday’s Death
Jake Tapper Questions Framing of an Old Clip of Him Saying a ‘Politburo’...
Iowa Congressional Candidate’s ‘Security’ (He's a Mayor) Knocks Phone Out of Reporter’s Ha...
We Are Coke State: 14 Arrested in Fraternity Run Drug Ring at Penn...

Seriously? Josh Earnest thinks 'most transparent administration in history' deserves credit for effort

It’s been a long time since the phrase “most transparent administration in history” has been regarded as anything but a punchline. Even a spokesman for the State Department couldn’t keep a straight face earlier this month while trying to make the claim in front of the assembled press corps.

Advertisement

It’s no surprise, then, that plenty got a good chuckle Wednesday when White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest himself had a letter to the editor published in the New York Times in which he complained that a recent opinion column “did not acknowledge the important and unprecedented steps that the Obama administration has taken to fulfill the president’s promise to lead the most transparent White House in history.”

https://twitter.com/Opus2360/status/770989994601226240

This really is the most bizarre election cycle in recent memory: the White House press secretary is complaining to one of its biggest water carriers about journalists not giving credit to the Obama administration where it’s due. “If President Obama’s government transparency effort is not even noted by The Times’s media columnist,” he frets, “then why would future presidential candidates make it a priority?”

Why would future candidates make transparency a priority? Hopefully, because it’s the right thing to do, simple as that. If not that, then because the law compels them to, and the people and the press demand it. If not that, then only to cast themselves in sharp contrast against the current administration.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/fakederonreid/status/771103385747464192

Sorry, no partial credit will be granted for “intentions” or “effort,” only results.

Advertisement

Transparent!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos