Creaky Crockett: Texas Democrat Senate Hopeful Garbles Her Newest JD Vance Talking Point...
It’s All the Lies: Chuck Todd Blames Public’s Distrust of the Media on...
Also-Ran Rand: Kentucky Senator Says He Will NOT Back JD Vance If He...
New Reason to Skip Seattle: Government Says Just Flush the Rats Climbing Your...
Pro Shoppers Only: Kicking the Clueless Out of the Store Till Christmas
Bake the Cake, Bigot: X Reminds Governor Polis What Rolling Back Freedoms Actually...
Outlier Out-and-Out Liar: Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Question About Dems’ Record Low Approval...
But Trump! Tim Kaine Isn’t Too Worried His Former Running Mate’s Husband Is...
Christmas Came Early: Andrew Tate Finally Meets a Man Who Hits Back –...
Kaaa-BOOM! Anna Paulina Luna OBLITERATES Uber-Creepy Scott Wiener In Heated Exchange
The Rot in California: Jury Says It's OK to Tow Federal Vehicles During...
Our Gift to You This Holiday Season
No, Seth Moulton, You Are Not God; You Don't Get to Define What...
Sen. John Kennedy Calls for 'Another Reconciliation Bill'
Surprise! Nicki Minaj Electrifies at AmFest, Standing Up for Trump and Global Christians

More liberals wonder why Benghazi scandal persists despite election being over

It was just over a month ago when Obama deputy campaign manager and lying liar Stephanie Cutter got the ball rolling, declaring that the Sept. 11 terrorist attack in Libya was only an issue because Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan insisted on politicizing it — a claim that seems even more outrageous in light of the “French kiss” of a third presidential debate.

Advertisement

Confronted yesterday with a question about Benghazi, Democratic Party Communications Director Brad Woodhouse replied by tweeting simply, “We won.” And yet the hearings continue, even though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid yesterday smacked down the proposal of a Senate select committee. His reasoning? “The elections are over; it is time to put aside the partisan politicization of national security.”

This time it’s Josh Marshall’s turn to ask: Why won’t you wingnuts on the right just let it go? (Marshall is publisher of Talking Points Memo, which provides special snowflake Soledad O’Brien with her crib notes.)

Finding out the truth behind Benghazi isn’t going to change the election results, so why cling bitterly to that “tragedy”? Marshall asked, and conservatives answered.

https://twitter.com/ScottGalupo/status/269945077659471872

Advertisement

Panicking? Well, even the New York Times’ Maureen Dowd in her Sunday column calls out Amb. Susan Rice for “renting her soul” in order to advance in the administration.

https://twitter.com/ScottGalupo/status/269946821617524736

So, wouldn’t a thorough investigation put to rest the idea that there is something there? Those who managed to pay attention to the election and the developments in Libya can name quite a few things to investigate, actually.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/ScottGalupo/status/269949460669399041

Conversely, with the election over and Obama seemingly in office for another four years without challenge, what possible harm could come from asking questions if there really is no there there? Wouldn’t it be satisfying to shut down all those scandal-minded conspiracy theorists on the right by proving them to be just that?

In fact, Media Matters seems to think that Obama’s just getting more popular despite Fox News’ insistence on covering the story.

We know a lot of people are suffering from election fatigue, but forgive us if we’d like some straight answers once and for all.

https://twitter.com/SonnyBunch/status/269949439882457092

Advertisement

Nope, that’s not it. It’s just sour grapes.

https://twitter.com/Bow2kaos/status/269959033748860928

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement